The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Needleless electrospinning. I. A comparison of cylinder and disk nozzles
Abstract
In this study, we demonstrated the needleless electrospinning of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanofibers with two nozzles, a rotating disk and a cylinder, and examined the effect of the nozzle shape on the electrospinning process and resultant fiber morphology. The disk nozzle needed a relatively low applied voltage to initiate fiber formation, and the fibers were mainly formed on the top disk edge. Also, the PVA concentration had little influence on the disk electrospinning process (up to 11 wt %). In comparison, the cylinder electrospinning showed a higher dependence on the applied voltage and polymer concentration. The fibers were initiated from the cylinder ends first and then from the entire cylinder surface only if the applied voltage were increased to a certain level. With the same polymer solution, the critical voltage needed to generate nanofibers from the disk nozzle was lower than that needed to generate nanofibers from the cylinder. Both electrospinning systems could produce uniform nanofibers, but the fibers produced from the disk nozzle were finer than those from the cylinder when the operating conditions were the same. A thin disk (8 cm in diameter and 2 mm thick) could produce nanofibers at a rate similar to that of a cylinder of the same diameter but 100 times wider (i.e., 20 cm long). Finite element analysis of electric field profiles of the nozzles revealed a concentrated electric field on the disk edge. For the cylinder nozzle, an uneven distribution of the electric field intensity profile along the nozzle surface was observed. The field lines were mainly concentrated on the cylinder ends, with a much lower electric field intensity formed in the middle surface area. At the same applied voltage, the electric field intensity on the disk edge was much higher than that on the cylinder end. These differences in the electric field intensity profiles could explain the differences in the fiber fineness and rate of the nanofibers produced from these two nozzles. These findings will benefit the design and further development of large‐scale electrospinning systems for the mass production of nanofibers for advanced applications. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ji, D., Lin, Y., Guo, X., Ramasubramanian, B., Wang, R., Radacsi, N., Jose, R., Qin, X., & Ramakrishna, S. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00278-z · Cited by 756
Electrospinning of nanofibers: Potentials and perspectives for active food packaging
Zhang, C., Li, Y., Wang, P., & Zhang, H. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12536 · Cited by 420
Recent advances in nanofibre fabrication techniques
Nayak, R., Padhye, R., Kyratzis, I. L., Truong, Y. B., & Arnold, L. (2012) · Textile Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0040517511424524 · Cited by 375
Technological advances in electrospinning of nanofibers
Teo, W.-E., Inai, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/12/1/013002 · Cited by 361
Yang, G., Li, X., He, Y., Ma, J., Ni, G., & Zhou, S. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Niu, H., Lin, T., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3524-3530
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2084359593
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Needleless electrospinning. I. A comparison of cylinder and disk nozzles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.30891
- The paper
- Niu, H., Lin, T., & Wang, X. (2009). Needleless electrospinning. I. A comparison of cylinder and disk nozzles. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.