Cited by 53Natural Fiber Reinforced Compositesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and properties

Biodegradation of Phormium tenax/poly(lactic acid) composites

Fortunati, E., Puglia, D., Santulli, C., Sarasini, F., Kenny, J. M.·2012·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

The disintegration patterns of composites produced by a melt compounding process using 0, 20, 30, and 40 wt % of Phormium tenax fibers in poly(lactic acid) (PLA) matrix were studied for a period of 40 days in composting conditions. The characterization of PLA and PLA/phormium composites included disintegration measurements, differential scanning calorimetry, FTIR analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The two controlling factors for disintegrability appeared to be the crystallinity of PLA and phormium fiber content: in general, the matrix tends to disintegrate completely before the 40 days and also phormium fibers undergo a substantial degradation during this period of time. Measurements taken at 10, 20, 30, and 40 days confirm that the disintegration process progresses steadily, though most of it takes place between 20 and 30 days. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.36839

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the initial period of disintegration (9 days), films become breakable and opaque as a consequence of changes in the polymer matrices' refraction index due to water absorption and/or presence of products formed by the hydrolytic degradation process.

    “During the initial period of the disintegration (9 days, Fig. 7-a ) films become breakable and opaque as a consequence of the changes in the polymer matrices refraction index due to the water absorption and/or presence of products formed by the hydrolytic degradation process [47].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 53

Authors
Fortunati, E., Puglia, D., Santulli, C., Sarasini, F., & Kenny, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Santulli, C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05
Volume
125
Issue
S2
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W1980176727
Cited by
53
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
Phormium tenax, polylactic acid, natural fiber composites, biodegradation, composting, disintegration, crystallinity, fiber degradation, melt blending, biodegradable polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review