Diving back in time: Extending historical baselines for yelloweye rockfish with Indigenous knowledge
Abstract
Ocean systems, and the culturally and commercially important fishes that inhabit them, face growing threats. Increasingly, unconventional data sources are being used to inform fisheries research and management for data‐poor species. Listed as a species of special concern in Canada, yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) are vulnerable to exploitation, and have historical and cultural value to Indigenous people. In this study, Indigenous fishers of British Columbia, Canada, were interviewed and asked about observed changes to the body sizes (length) and abundance of this species over the last ~60 years, and the factors driving these changes. Their current and historical estimates of size and abundance were compared with current biological survey data. Forty‐two semi‐directed interviews were carried out and 89% of respondents observed a decrease in yelloweye rockfish body sizes since the 1980s. The median historical (1950s–1980s) length was 84 cm, compared with the median modern (2010–2015) length of 46 cm. All but one respondent reported substantial decrease in yelloweye rockfish abundance since their earliest fishing experiences (1950s to1980s, depending on participant's age), with a third suggesting the change was most evident in the early 2000s, followed by the 1980s (21%) and 1990s (17%). Sizes of modern yelloweye rockfish estimated by participants resembled estimates derived from ecological data recorded concurrently at the study region. This study illustrates a repeata…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inclusion of Indigenous knowledge systems in fisheries research and management has been shown to yield otherwise inaccessible ecological insights such as missing baseline information.
“yield otherwise inaccessible ecological insights such as missing baseline information (Eckert et al., 2018;Marin et al., 2017)”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Eckert et al., 2018
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743 · see citing works
Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Collie, J. S., Costello, C., Fogarty, M. J., Fulton, E. A., Hutchings, J. A., Jennings, S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1173146 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Thornton, T. F., & Scheer, A. M. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04714-170308 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“…abundance and size of exploited species (Frid et al., 2016); yield otherwise inaccessible ecological insights such as missing baseline information (Eckert et al., 2018; Marin et al., 2017); and play a critical role in the improvement and the collective adherence to fisheries policy (Berkes, 2018;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe contributions of Indigenous Peoples and local communities to ecological restoration
Reyes‐García, V., Fernández‐Llamazares, Á., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Öllerer, K., Wilson, S. J., & Brondizio, E. S. (2019) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12894 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eckert, L. E., Ban, N. C., Frid, A., & McGreer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Central Coast Indigenous Resource Alliance (CCIRA) Campbell River BC Canada
- Corresponding author
- Eckert, Lauren E.
- Venue
- Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-166
- ISSN
- 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0755
- OpenAlex
- W2762771310
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (435785)
- Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network (EC1‐NB‐UVIC)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (1406.03, 2016/17)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435‐2013‐0059)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- yelloweye rockfish, indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, historical baselines, body size reduction, fish abundance decline, data-poor species, fisheries management, British Columbia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review