Cited by 18Turtle Biology and ConservationFish Ecology and Management StudiesHydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact

Amazonian run‐of‐river dam reservoir impacts underestimated: Evidence from a before–after control–impact study of freshwater turtle nesting areas

Open access
Bárcenas‐García, Andrea, Michalski, Fernanda, Gibbs, James P., Norris, Darren·2022·Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Hydropower dams are associated with adverse impacts on biodiversity, yet there remains a lack of robust scientific evidence documenting the magnitude of these impacts, particularly across highly biodiverse tropical waterways. Aquatic and semi‐aquatic vertebrates are disproportionately affected by human changes to aquatic environments and hydropower expansion is an increasing threat to the Endangered yellow‐spotted river turtle ( Podocnemis unifilis ) across its tropical South American range. Yellow‐spotted river turtle nesting areas were monitored as an indicator of dry season river level changes following run‐of‐river dam reservoir filling. A before–after control–impact (BACI) study design was used with multi‐year field campaigns monitoring turtle nesting areas upstream of the dam. The cause and extent of changes in nesting areas were established using generalized additive models. Nesting area density was evaluated in relation to time (before vs. after), treatment (control vs. impact), time–treatment interaction (BACI), distance to the dam and precipitation. The extent of changes was examined by comparing the remaining proportion of nesting areas after reservoir filling. Dam construction generated an immediate and apparently permanent dry season river‐level rise that extended more than 20 km beyond impact assessment limits. On average the density of nesting areas declined by 69% (from 0.48 to 0.15 per km) across 33 km of river directly affected by the dam. This loss was reflected in a significant BACI interaction. Nesting area density was not explained by seasonal precipitation. Monitoring of freshwater turtle nesting areas provided an effective means to quantify hydropower dam impacts across biodiverse yet rapidly changing waterways. The adverse impacts documented in this study should be preventable by mitigation actions including habitat creation and dry season flow regulation. Such measures are also likely to benefit multiple sandbar‐nesting species (including turtles, crocodiles and birds) in tropical rivers increasingly influenced by run‐of‐river dams.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aqc.3775

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 99 · Cited by 18

Authors
Bárcenas‐García, A., Michalski, F., Gibbs, J. P., & Norris, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR)
  • Instituto Pró-Carnívoros (BR)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Darren
Venue
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-07
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
508-522
ISSN
  • 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0755
OpenAlex
W4210847670
Cited by
18
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (302806/2018‐0, 403679/2016‐8)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (88882.429990/2019‐01)
  • United States Agency for International Development (AID‐OAA‐A11‐00012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
Keywords
hydroelectric dams, run-of-river dams, reservoir impacts, freshwater turtles, Podocnemis unifilis, Amazonian rivers, habitat loss, flow regulation, habitat mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review