Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. I. Identification of proliferative cell types and pinpointing of the stem cell

Karam, Sherif M., Leblond, Charles Philippe·1993·The Anatomical Record

Abstract

In a recent study of the corpus epithelium in the mouse stomach, eleven cell types have been identified and enumerated (Karam and Leblond: Anat. Rec. 232:231–246, 1992). The dynamics of these cells will be examined in a series of five articles, of which this is the first. This article focuses on the proliferative ability of the cells, as measured by the labeling index in radioautographs from mice sacrificed 30 min after an intravenous injection of 3 H‐thymidine. Furthermore, the ultrastructure of the cells found to be proliferative was examined in the hope of finding features characteristic of stem cells. On the basis of their labeling index, the epithelial cells have been classified into four groups. The first includes three cell types which do not take up any label and accordingly are non‐dividing: parietal or oxyntic cells, cells named pre‐parietal as they are immature cells suspected of being parietal cell precursors, and the rare caveolated or brush cells. The second group is composed of three cell types which are only rarely labeled and, therefore, divide only occasionally: zymogenic or chief cells, entero‐endocrine cells, and cells named pre‐zymogenic cells as they are suspected of being zymogenic cell precursors. The third group includes two cell types which are always labeled at a low degree and, therefore, divide regularly, but at a low rate: surface mucous cells, herein called pit cells, whose labeling index is 0.8%, and mucous neck cells, simply known as neck cells, 1.8%. The final group consists of three immature cell types with high labeling indices indicating a high rate of division: granule‐free cells, which are devoid of secretory granules and have the highest labeling index, 32.4%, prepit cells, which possess a few dense secretory granules similar to, but smaller than, those in pit cells, 24.6%, and pre‐neck cells, with a small number of secretory granules similar to, but smaller than, those in neck cells, 11.3%. These three cell types, as well as pre‐parietal cells, are rapidly renewed, with the turnover times estimated at 3.0 days for pre‐neck and pre‐parietal cells and less than 2.6 days for granule‐free and pre‐pit cells. Ultrastructural studies of granule‐free cells reveal that they may be sub‐divided into three subtypes according to their Golgi features: subtype I, which consists of undifferentiated cells in which the Golgi trans face exhibits no prosecretory vesicles; subtype II, named pre‐pit cell precursors because the Golgi trans face shows prosecretory vesicles similar to those in pre‐pit cells; and subtype III, named pre‐neck cell precursors, whose prosecretory vesicles are similar to those in pre‐neck cells. On the other hand, pre‐parietal cells include three variants that could each arise from a different granule‐free subtype: variant I, which has no mucous secretory granules, could arise from the undifferentiated cells; variant II, which possesses dense mucous granules similar to those in pre‐pit cells, could come from pre‐pit cell precursors; and variant III, which has cored granules as in pre‐neck cells, could come from pre‐neck cell precursors. Only the undifferentiated granule‐free cells have the features expected from stem cells and, therefore, are considered to be the stem cells of the epithelium. A model based on the radioautographic and morphological data (Fig. 17) summarises the filiation of the other immature cell types as follows. The undifferentiated granule‐free cells as stem cells reproduce themselves and give rise to three other cell types: (1) the pre‐parietal cells lacking secretory granules (i.e., variant I); (2) the pre‐pit cell precursors, which mainly give rise to pre‐pit cells, but also yield the variant II pre‐parietal cells; (3) the pre‐neck cell precursors, which mainly give rise to pre‐neck cells, but also yield the variant III pre‐parietal cells. Further differentiation of these immature cell types into the other cells of the corpus epithelium is examined in the succeeding articles. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.1092360202

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Karam, S. M., & Leblond, C. P.
Venue
The Anatomical Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
236
Issue
2
Pages
259-279
ISSN
  • 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0185
OpenAlex
W2156315689
Cited by
372
References
0
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. I. Identification of proliferative cell types and pinpointing of the stem cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ar.1092360202
The paper
Karam, S. M., & Leblond, C. P. (1993). Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. I. Identification of proliferative cell types and pinpointing of the stem cell. The Anatomical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092360202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.