The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine
Open accessAbstract
As an essential organ of both weight bearing and locomotion, the spine is subject to the conflict of providing maximal stability while maintaining crucial mobility, in addition to maintaining the integrity of the neural structures. Comparative morphological adaptation of the lumbar spine of mammals, especially in respect to locomotion, has however received only limited scientific attention. Specialised features of the human lumbar spine, have therefore not been adequately highlighted through comparative anatomy. Mathematical averages were determined of 14 measurements taken on each lumbar vertebrae of ten mammalian species (human, chimpanzee, orang‐utan, kangaroo, dolphin, seal, Przewalski's horse, cheetah, lama, ibex). The revealed traits are analysed with respect to the differing spinal loading patterns. All examined mammalian lumbar spines suggest an exact accommodation to specific biomechanical demands. The lumbar spine has reacted to flexion in a predominant plane with narrowing of the vertebral bodies in quadrupeds. Torsion of the lumbar spine is withstood by an increase in the transverse distance between the inferior articular processes in the upper lumbar spine in primates, but lower lumbar spine in humans, quadrupeds and the seal. Sagittal zygapophyseal joint areas resist torsion in the seal and humans. Ventral shear is resisted by frontal zygapophyseal joint areas in humans and primates, and dorsal shear by encompassing joints in the ibex. The human fifth lumbar vertebra is remarkable in possessing the largest endplate surface area and the widest distance between the inferior articular processes, as an indicator of the high degree of axial load and torsion in bipedalism. Anat Rec 264:157–168, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?
Alini, M., Eisenstein, S. M., Ito, K., Little, C., Kettler, A. A., Masuda, K., Melrose, J., Ralphs, J., Stokes, I., & Wilke, H. J. (2008) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0414-y · Cited by 698
Comparison of Animals Used in Disc Research to Human Lumbar Disc Geometry
O’Connell, G. D., Vresilovic, E. J., & Elliott, D. M. (2007) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000253961.40910.c1 · Cited by 329
Morphological variation of the thoracolumbar vertebrae in Macropodidae and its functional relevance
Chen, X., Milne, N., & O'Higgins, P. (2005) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.10370 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Boszczyk, B. M., Boszczyk, A. A., & Putz, R.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-28
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-168
- ISSN
- 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0185
- OpenAlex
- W2025549353
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ar.1156
- The paper
- Boszczyk, B. M., Boszczyk, A. A., & Putz, R. (2001). Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine. The Anatomical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.