The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cochlear Implant: Historical Aspects and Future Prospects
Open accessAbstract
The cochlear implant (CI) is the first effective treatment for deafness and severe losses in hearing. As such, the CI is now widely regarded as one of the great advances in modern medicine. This article reviews the key events and discoveries that led up to the current CI systems, and we review and present some among the many possibilities for further improvements in device design and performance. The past achievements include: (1) development of reliable devices that can be used over the lifetime of a patient; (2) development of arrays of implanted electrodes that can stimulate more than one site in the cochlea; and (3) progressive and large improvements in sound processing strategies for CIs. In addition, cooperation between research organizations and companies greatly accelerated the widespread availability and use of safe and effective devices. Possibilities for the future include: (1) use of otoprotective drugs; (2) further improvements in electrode designs and placements; (3) further improvements in sound processing strategies; (4) use of stem cells to replace lost sensory hair cells and neural structures in the cochlea; (5) gene therapy; (6) further reductions in the trauma caused by insertions of electrodes and other manipulations during implant surgeries; and (7) optical rather electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Each of these possibilities is the subject of active research. Although great progress has been made to date in the development of the CI, including the first substantial restoration of a human sense, much more progress seems likely and certainly would not be a surprise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, cochlear implants have been highly successful, despite their relatively low channel count ( $ 20) (Eshraghi et al., 2012).”
From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Eshraghi et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity
Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., & Deisseroth, K. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1525 · Cited by 5,015
Math1 : An Essential Gene for the Generation of Inner Ear Hair Cells
Bermingham, N. A., Hassan, B. A., Price, S. D., Vollrath, M. A., Ben‐Arie, N., Eatock, R. A., Bellen, H. J., Lysakowski, A., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1837 · Cited by 1,093
Rf, G. (1985) · Cited by 949
Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future
Wilson, B. S., & Dorman, M. F. (2008) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.005 · Cited by 918
Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals
Izumikawa, M., Minoda, R., Kawamoto, K., Abrashkin, K. A., Swiderski, D. L., Dolan, D. F., Brough, D. E., & Raphael, Y. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1193 · Cited by 742
Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance
Shapiro, M. G., Homma, K., Villarreal, S., Richter, C., & Bezanilla, F. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1742 · Cited by 613
Gantz, B. J., Turner, C. W., Gfeller, K. E., & Lowder, M. W. (2005) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000157695.07536.d2 · Cited by 502
Clark, G. M. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97263 · Cited by 443
Biophysical Mechanisms of Transient Optical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve
Wells, J. D., Kao, C., Konrad, P. E., Milner, T., Kim, J., Mahadevan-Jansen, A. M., & Jansen, D. (2007) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.104786 · Cited by 386
Combining acoustic and electrical hearing
Gantz, B. J., & Turner, C. W. (2003) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200310000-00012 · Cited by 379
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1016/S0194-59989670097-9 · DOI
- Desloges P, 1779, Observations d'un sourd et muèt, sur un cours elémentaire d'education des sourds et muèts. M. l'Abbé Deschamps (Chapelain de l'Église d'Orléans)
- Doyle J, 1963, Electical stimulation of eight nerve deafness, Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc, 28, 148
- 10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056006 · DOI
- Robinson AM, 2011, Histological evaluation of the cochlea following chronic infrared neural stimulation, Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 34, 491
- Volta A, 1982, Historical records documenting the first galvanic battery, “the volta column.” Circa 1800. Asimov's biographical encyclopedia of science and technology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sound Strategies for Hearing Restoration
Géléoc, G. S. G., & Holt, J. R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1241062 · Cited by 250
Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface
Saal, H. P., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.010 · Cited by 179
“Indeed, cochlear implants have been highly successful, despite their relatively low channel count ( 20)(Eshraghi et al., 2012).”
Roche, J. P., & Hansen, M. R. (2015) · Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009 · Cited by 149
Cochlear Implantation: An Overview
Deep, N. L., Dowling, E., Jethanamest, D., & Carlson, M. L. (2018) · Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1669411 · Cited by 143
When Bio Meets Technology: Biohybrid Neural Interfaces
Rochford, A. E., Carnicer‐Lombarte, A., Curto, V. F., Malliaras, G. G., & Barone, D. G. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201903182 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Eshraghi, A. A., Nazarian, R., Telischi, F. F., Rajguru, S. M., Truy, E., & Gupta, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eshraghi, Adrien A.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-08
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1967-1980
- ISSN
- 1932-8486 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-8494
- PMC
- PMC4921065
- OpenAlex
- W2093601481
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Anatomical Record (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC011481)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- cochlear implants, history of cochlear implants, profound hearing loss, electrode arrays, stem cell therapy, gene therapy, cochlear implantation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cochlear Implants, Deafness, Humans, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
