The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Analysis of Histological Staining and Fluorescence Using ImageJ
Open accessAbstract
An important objective for scientists is to statistically compare staining intensity (Fig. 1) or fluorescence (Fig. 2) for a particular marker between treatments or groups.Simply "eyeballing" an image and stating that a particular treatment or group is more densely stained or brightly fluorescent than another treatment or group is insufficient for scientific publications.Systems are available for image analysis in immunohistochemistry.However, many of these systems require expensive software and hardware attachments for acquisition, analysis, and storage of images.Therefore, an inexpensive and reliable alternative for image analysis is desirable.The cost effective answer for quantitative immunohistochemical analysis is ImageJ, developed by Wayne Rasband (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/index.html).ImageJ is a Java image processing and analysis program based on NIH Image for the Macintosh.ImageJ is available in the public domain (i.e., free).ImageJ runs on any computer that is a Java 1.5 or later virtual machine.Java runtime environments are available for free from Sun Microsystems or bundled with platform-specific installations of ImageJ (rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).Downloadable copies are available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX.For the evaluation of immunohistochemistry slides using ImageJ, images are captured onto the hard drive of the workstation computer.Thereafter, captured images are opened in NIH Image/ ImageJ for evaluating indices of positivity on immunohistochemistry slides, as well as fluorescence images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Principles and approaches for reproducible scoring of tissue stains in research
Meyerholz, D. K., & Beck, A. P. (2018) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/s41374-018-0057-0 · Cited by 341
Li, W., Englund, E., Widner, H., Mattsson, B., van Westen, D., Lätt, J., Rehncrona, S., Brundin, P., Björklund, A., Lindvall, O., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1605245113 · Cited by 313
Transfection types, methods and strategies: a technical review
Chong, Z. X., Yeap, S. K., & Ho, W. Y. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11165 · Cited by 303
Zhou, X., Wahane, S., Friedl, M.-S., Kluge, M., Friedel, C. C., Avrampou, K., Zachariou, V., Guo, L., Zhang, B., He, X., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0597-7 · Cited by 275
Suleman, M., Yasmin, S., Rasul, M., Yahya, M., Atta, B. M., & Mirza, M. S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204408 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, E. C.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-04
- Volume
- 296
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 378-381
- ISSN
- 1932-8486 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-8494
- OpenAlex
- W1535485604
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Analysis of Histological Staining and Fluorescence Using ImageJ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ar.22641
- The paper
- Jensen, E. C. (2013). Quantitative Analysis of Histological Staining and Fluorescence Using ImageJ. The Anatomical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.