Humeral Cross‐Sectional Shape in Suspensory Primates and Sloths
Open accessAbstract
Studies on the cross‐sectional geometry of long bones in African apes have documented that shape ratios derived from second moments of area about principle axes (e.g., I max / I min ) are often correlated with habitual locomotor behaviors. For example, humeral cross‐sections tend to appear more circular in more arboreal and forelimb suspensory chimpanzees compared with terrestrial quadrupedal gorillas. These data support the hypothesis that cross‐sections that are more circular in shape are adapted for multidirectional loading regimes and bending moments encountered when using acrobatic locomotor behaviors. Whether a more circular humerus reflects greater use of forelimb suspension in other primates and nonprimate mammals is unknown. In this study, cross‐sections at or near midshaft of the humerus were obtained from anthropoid primates that differ in their use of forelimb suspension, as well as from two genera of suspensory sloths. I max / I min ratios were compared within and between groups, and correlations were made with behavioral data. In broad comparisons, observed differences in morphology follow predicted patterns. Humeri of suspensory sloths are circular. Humeri of the more suspensory hominoids tend to be more circular than those of quadrupedal taxa. Humeri of the suspensory atelines are similar to hominoids, while those of Cebus are more like nonsuspensory cercopithecoids. There is, however, considerable overlap between taxa and within finer comparisons variation between species are not in the predicted direction. Thus, although I max / I min ratios of the humerus are informative for characterizing generalized locomotor modes (i.e., forelimb suspensory vs. quadrupedal), additional structural information is needed for more fine‐grained assessments of locomotion. Anat Rec, 296:545–556, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ratio of Imax over Imin provides a reliable measure for the ellipticity of the transverse bone shaft.
“The ratio of Imax over Imin provides a reliable measure for the ellipticity of the transverse bone shaft and has been considered as such in biomechanical explorations12,60,66,67.”
From Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx (2018) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Patel, B. A., Ruff, C. B., Simons, E. L. R., & Organ, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Midwestern University (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patel, Biren A.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-13
- Volume
- 296
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545-556
- ISSN
- 1932-8486 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-8494
- OpenAlex
- W2171364965
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Anatomical Record (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0550676)
- Smithsonian Institution
- Stony Brook University
- National Museum of Natural History
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- humerus, cross-sectional geometry, suspensory locomotion, sloths, anthropoid primates, hominoids, cercopithecoids, second moment of area, bending moment, locomotor adaptation, skeletal morphology
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Haplorhini, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humerus, Locomotion, Male, Sloths, Species Specificity, Weight-Bearing, Multidetector Computed Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review