Torsional resistance as a principal component of the structural design of long bones: Comparative multivariate evidence in birds
Abstract
Here we study the occurrence of torsion‐resisting morphological and histological features (thin bone walls, circular shaft cross‐section, oblique collagen fibers, and laminar tissue arrangement) in a sample of 168 long bones from wings and legs of 22 bird species. These structural parameters were measured in mid diaphyseal undemineralized cross‐sections and analyzed using uni‐, bi‐, and multivariate (principal components analysis) data analysis techniques. We found that the four variables are significantly and positively correlated, and that covariation between variables accounts for as much as 58% of the total variation. These results suggest that torsion is a main determinant of the macro‐ and microstructural design of long bones in birds. Humerus, ulna, and femur generally possess torsion‐resisting features, while other bones (radius, carpometacarpus, tibiotarsus, tarsometatarsus, and foot phalanx) rather show bending/axial load‐resisting structural properties. These results are congruent with in vivo strain data from the literature, which reported high torsional loading in humerus and ulna during flapping flight, but also in the subhorizontal avian femur during terrestrial locomotion. The precise function of the laminar tissue spatial arrangement, the role of pneumatization, and the influence of flight mode are discussed. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Charadriiformes share an elevated average relative cortical thickness with respect to other orders of flying birds, likely as an adaptation to negotiate strong winds in coastal and marine habitats.
“Charadriiformes (Supplementary Fig. 1) share an elevated average relative cortical thickness with respect to other orders of flying birds (Supplementary Data 1, Supplementary Fig. 6), likely as an adaptation to negotiate “strong winds” in coastal and marine habitats10.”
From Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- De Margerie, E., Sanchez, S., Cubo, J., & Castanet, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-06
- Volume
- 282A
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-66
- ISSN
- 1552-4884 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4892
- OpenAlex
- W1995005618
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- torsional resistance, long bones, bone histology, circular cross-section, flapping flight, avian locomotion, humerus, ulna, femur, pneumatization, flight modes, birds
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Flight, Animal, Leg Bones, Species Specificity, Wings, Animal, Torque
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review