Cited by 50Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesFish Biology and Ecology StudiesDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Conus arteriosus of the teleost heart: Dismissed, but not missed

Icardo, José M.·2006·The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

The heart outflow tract (OFT) of primitive fish is formed by two portions: a proximal conus arteriosus and a distal bulbus arteriosus. The OFT of modern teleosts is considered to be formed by a single component, the bulbus, the conus having been lost through evolution. This article challenges the concept of the disappearance of the conus arteriosus in the teleost heart. A total of 28 teleost species belonging to 19 families and 10 orders were analyzed. The hearts were divided into two large groups: those having entirely trabeculated ventricles, and those possessing a compacta. In the hearts having entirely trabeculated ventricles, the conus arteriosus appears as a distinct segment interposed between the ventricle and the bulbus arteriosus, being formed by compact vascularized myocardium. However, the conus of several species lacks vessels. In these cases, the conus presents large intercellular spaces bounded by collagen. In the hearts possessing a ventricular compacta, the conus either appears as a muscular ring of variable length connecting the ventricle and the bulbus or forms a crown or ring of myocardium apposed to the ventricular base. In all the teleosts studied, the conus can be recognized as an anatomic entity different from the ventricle. Furthermore, the conus appears as a distinct heart segment in the developing fish. Therefore, the conus arteriosus has not been lost in evolution and constitutes a fundamental part of the teleost OFT. In all the species studied, the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.a.20361

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 50

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.016 · DOI
  2. Anthony J, 1965, Le coeur et l'aorte ventrale de Latimeria chalumnae (Poisson, Coelocanthidae), CRS Acad Sci, 261, 223
  3. Bertin L, 1958, fasc. 2, 1399
  4. Bugge J, 1961, The heart of the African lungfish, Protopterus, Vidensk Meddr Dansk Natuhr Foren, 123, 193
  5. Burggren WW, 1997, Handbook of physiology, sect. 13, comparative physiology, 215
  6. De la Cruz MV, 1999, Coronary artery anomalies, 1
  7. 10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60331-3 · DOI
  8. Gegenbauer C, 1866, Zur vergleichenden Anatomie des Herzens: I, über den Bulbus arteriosus der Fische, Jena Z Naturwiss, 2, 365
  9. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.042 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/jmor.10200 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb13194.x · DOI
  12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990301)254:3<396::AID-AR11>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991001)256:2<116::AID-AR2>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  14. 10.1159/000016781 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02249.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/ar.10080 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/ar.10170 · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00186.x · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jmor.10340 · DOI
  20. Jiang X, 2000, Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest, Development, 127, 1606, 10.1242/dev.127.8.1607 · DOI
  21. Kardong KV, 2002, Vertebrates: comparative anatomy, function, evolution
  22. 10.1002/1096-8628(200024)97:4<238::AID-AJMG1274>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  23. Parsons CW, 1930, The conus arteriosus in fishes, QJ Microsc Sci, 73, 145
  24. Robertson JI, 1914, The development of the heart and vascular system of Lepidosiren paradoxa, QJ Microsc Sci, 59, 53
  25. 10.1002/ar.1092410407 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-70135-1_1 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/CBO9780511983719 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.0021-8782.2002.00110.x · DOI
  29. Senior HD, 1907, Teleosts with a conus arteriosus having more than one row of valves, Anat Rec, 4, 83
  30. Sheehan DC, 1980, Theory and practice of histotechnology
  31. 10.1002/ar.1090150203 · DOI
  32. Thompson RP, 1985, Cardiac morphogenesis, 169
  33. 10.1002/jez.1402520413 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.02.012 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/B978-0-12-119401-7.50010-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Icardo, J. M.
Venue
The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-11
Volume
288A
Issue
8
Pages
900-908
ISSN
  • 1552-4884 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4892
OpenAlex
W2054547150
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
conus arteriosus, teleost heart, bulbus arteriosus, heart evolution, heart development
MeSH terms
Animals, Fishes, Heart, Heart Valves, Heart Ventricles, Terminology as Topic, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review