The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A modified Mask region‐based convolutional neural network approach for the automated detection of archaeological sites on high‐resolution light detection and ranging‐derived digital elevation models in the North German Lowland
Abstract
Due to complicated backgrounds and unclear target orientation, automated object detection is difficult in the field of archaeology. Most of the current convolutional neural network (CNN) object‐oriented detection techniques are based on a faster region‐based CNN (R‐CNN) and other one‐stage detectors that often lack adequate processing speeds and detection accuracies. Recently, the two‐stage detector Mask R‐CNN technique achieved impressive results in object detection and instance segmentation problems and was successfully applied in the analysis of archaeological airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. In this study, we outline a modified Mask R‐CNN technique that reliably and efficiently detects relict charcoal hearth (RCH) sites on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data‐based digital elevation models (DEMs). Using image augmentation and image preprocessing steps combined with the deep learning‐based adaptive gradient method with a dynamic bound on the learning rate (AdaBound) optimization technique, we could improve the model's accuracy and significantly reduce its training time. We use DEMs based on high‐resolution LiDAR data and the visualization for archaeological topography (VAT) technique that give images with a very strong contrast of the terrain and the outline of the sites of interest in the North German Lowland. Therefore, the model can identify RCH sites with an average recall of 83% and an average precision of 87%. Techniques such as the modified Mask R‐CNN method outlined here will help to greatly improve our knowledge about archaeological site densities in the realm of historical charcoal production and past human‐landscape interactions. This method provides an accurate, time‐efficient and bias‐free large‐scale site mapping option not only for the North German Lowland but potentially for other landscapes as well.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mask R-CNN has demonstrated effectiveness in similar archaeological contexts, including detection of burial clusters in the Mongolian steppe, burials and charcoal hearth sites in Germany, and terraces in Samoa.
“Mask R-CNN has demonstrated its effectiveness in similar archaeological contexts34, including the detection of burial clusters across the Mongolian steppe35, burials36 and charcoal hearth sites37 in Germany, as well as terraces in Samoa38.”
From Multiscale anthropogenic feature detection in the argentinian andes: satellite machine learning, UAV, and pedestrian survey (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1007/s11760-020-01636-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104896 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117814 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137189 · DOI
- 10.1007/s41636-019-00171-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2019.104998 · DOI
- 10.5334/jcaa.49 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.1730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00152 · DOI
- 10.1080/0734578X.2018.1482186 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.020 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs5126427 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104991 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.103095 · DOI
- Girshick R., 2015, Fast r‐cnn, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
- Girshick R., 2014, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
- 10.1007/s00334-020-00769-z · DOI
- Gong Z., 2020, Research on gpr image recognition based on deep learning, Matec Web of Conferences, 309
- 10.3390/rs10020225 · DOI
- He K. Gkioxari G. Dollár P. &GirshickR. B.(2017).Mask r‐cnn. arXiv:1703.06870v3. · DOI · Paper page
- Henderson P., 2016, Computer Vision – ACCV 2016. ACCV 2016, 198
- 10.1002/arp.374 · DOI
- 10.1002/gea.21799 · DOI
- Johnson J. W.(2018).Adapting mask r‐cnn for automated nucleus segmentation. ArXiv abs/1805.00500. · arXiv
- Johnson K., 2015, Geospatial and LiDAR‐based analysis of 18th to early 20th century timber harvesting and charcoal production in southern New England, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs At: Bretton Woods, 47, 65
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924960 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-29891-3_43 · DOI
- 10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-493-2020 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs11070747 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs11070794 · DOI
- Lin T.‐Y. Maire M. Belongie S. Hays J. Perona P. Ramanan D. Dollár P. &Zitnick C. L.(2014).Microsoft coco: Common objects in context.Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8693 740–755.https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐10602‐1_48 · DOI · Paper page
- Long J., 2015, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
- Luo L., 2019, Adaptive gradient methods with dynamic bound of learning rate, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations
- 10.5334/jcaa.11 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.56205 · DOI
- 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517683 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.07.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.09.041 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.04.015 · DOI
- Schmidt M., 2016, Charcoal kiln sites, associated landscape attributes and historic forest conditions: DTM‐based investigations in Hesse (Germany), Forest Ecosystems, 3
- 10.1002/gea.21782 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114241 · DOI
- Schneider A. Takla M. Nicolay A. Raab A. &Raab T.(2014).A template‐matching approach combining morphometric variables for automated mapping of charcoal kiln sites.Archaeological Prospection 22(1) 45–62.https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1497 · DOI
- Simonyan K. &Zisserman A.(2014).Very deep convolutional networks for large‐scale image recognition.https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556v6
- 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.031 · DOI
- 10.1109/23.589532 · DOI
- Sorokin A.(2018).Lesion analysis and diagnosis with mask‐rcnn. arXiv: 1807.05979v2 · arXiv
- 10.1177/0309133318825284 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10113-020-01638-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.1731 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102241 · DOI
- 10.5334/jcaa.32 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijgi9050293 · DOI · Paper page
- Witharana C. Ouimet W. B. &Johnson K. M.(2018 GIScience & Remote Sensing).Using LiDAR and GEOBIA for automated extraction of 18th‐late 19th century relict charcoal hearths in southern New England.55(2) 183–204.https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1431356 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compag.2019.06.001 · DOI
- Zagoruyko S., 2016, A multipath network for object detection, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), 15.1
- 10.3390/rs3020398 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peters, M. J. H., Jambajantsan, A., Freire, V. Z., Pey, L., Vaquer, J. M., & Roberts, P. (2026) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-026-02813-z
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonhage, A., Eltaher, M., Raab, T., Breuß, M., Raab, A., & Schneider, A.
- Venue
- Archaeological Prospection
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-186
- ISSN
- 1075-2196
- 1099-0763
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review