Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study

Alarcón‐Segovia, Donato, Tumlin, James A., Furie, Richard A., McKay, James D., Cardiel, Mario H., Strand, Vibeke, Bagin, Robert G., Linnik, Matthew D., Hepburn, Bonnie, LJP 394 Investigator Consortium·2003·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether LJP 394 delays or prevents renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a history of renal disease. Methods: In a 76‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, 230 SLE patients were randomized to receive 16 weekly doses of 100 mg of LJP 394 or placebo, followed by alternating 8‐week drug holidays and 12 weekly doses of 50 mg of LJP 394 or placebo. An assay measuring the affinity of the serum IgG fraction for the DNA epitope of LJP 394 identified a high‐affinity population of patients (189 of 213 patients; 89% taking LJP 394 and 90% taking placebo). Analyses were performed on both the intent‐to‐treat population and the high‐affinity population. Results: Anti–double‐stranded DNA antibodies decreased and C3 levels tended to increase during treatment with LJP 394. In the intent‐to‐treat population, the time to renal flare was not significantly different between treatment groups, but patients taking LJP 394 had a longer time to institution of high‐dose corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide (HDCC) and required 41% fewer treatments with HDCC. In the high‐affinity population, the LJP 394 group experienced a longer time to renal flare, 67% fewer renal flares, longer time to institution of HDCC, and 62% fewer HDCC treatments compared with the placebo group. In patients with serum creatinine levels ≥1.5 mg/dl at study entry, those taking LJP 394 had 50% fewer renal flares; no renal flares were observed in the high‐affinity group taking LJP 394. Serious adverse events were observed in 25 of the 114 LJP 394–treated patients (21.9%) and 34 of the 116 placebo‐treated patients (29.3%). Conclusion: Treatment with LJP 394 in patients with high‐affinity antibodies to its DNA epitope prolonged the time to renal flare, decreased the number of renal flares, and required fewer HDCC treatments compared with placebo. The study drug appeared to be well tolerated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10763

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Alarcón‐Segovia, D., Tumlin, J. A., Furie, R. A., McKay, J. D., Cardiel, M. H., Strand, V., Bagin, R. G., Linnik, M. D., Hepburn, B., & LJP 394 Investigator Consortium
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
442-454
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1988862282
Cited by
244
References
2
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10763
The paper
Alarcón‐Segovia, D., Tumlin, J. A., Furie, R. A., McKay, J. D., Cardiel, M. H., Strand, V., Bagin, R. G., Linnik, M. D., Hepburn, B., & LJP 394 Investigator Consortium. (2003). LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.