The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup
Abstract
Objective: Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system (BACNS) is a subset of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) with favorable outcome, not requiring prolonged immunosuppression. We retrospectively studied the clinical characteristics and prospectively assessed long‐term outcome in a cohort of BACNS patients. Methods: Patients meeting the clinical description for BACNS, evaluated and treated by a single investigator, were included. Data on demographics, signs and symptoms, laboratory studies, neuroimaging, brain biopsy, treatment, and complications were recorded. The long‐term assessment included a phone interview utilizing the Barthel index and a specifically designed cognitive index. Results: Sixteen cases met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 40 years (range 10–66 years) with female:male ratio of 4.3:1 and a mean followup period of 35 months (0–128 months). Headache was the most common presenting symptom, seen in 88% of the cases, followed by focal symptoms (63%), and diffuse symptoms (44%). All patients had highly abnormal cerebral angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were present in 77% (10 of 13). Severe cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities were present in 1 patient (7%). All followup cerebral angiography showed marked improvement. Recovery was demonstrated in 94% of the patients, 6% relapsed, and there were no deaths. Of patients assessed by the Barthel index, 71% showed no disability and 29% had mild disability. Conclusion: There is a PACNS subset characterized by acute presentation (most commonly headache), normal to mildly abnormal CSF findings, female predominance, and highly abnormal cerebral angiography (reversible after treatment), requiring less intensive treatment than has been traditionally used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System
Birnbaum, J., & Hellmann, D. B. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.76 · Cited by 438
Hajj-Ali, R. A., Singhal, A. B., Benseler, S., Molloy, E., & Calabrese, L. H. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70081-3 · Cited by 323
Self-citationPrimary angiitis of the central nervous system
Molloy, E. S., & Hajj-Ali, R. A. (2007) · Current Treatment Options in Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf02938406 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hajj‐Ali, R. A., Furlan, A., Abou‐Chebel, A., & Calabrese, L. H.
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 662-669
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0123
- OpenAlex
- W1996361296
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10797
- The paper
- Hajj‐Ali, R. A., Furlan, A., Abou‐Chebel, A., & Calabrese, L. H. (2002). Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.