Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup

Hajj‐Ali, Rula A., Furlan, Anthony, Abou‐Chebel, Alex, Calabrese, Leonard H.·2002·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system (BACNS) is a subset of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) with favorable outcome, not requiring prolonged immunosuppression. We retrospectively studied the clinical characteristics and prospectively assessed long‐term outcome in a cohort of BACNS patients. Methods: Patients meeting the clinical description for BACNS, evaluated and treated by a single investigator, were included. Data on demographics, signs and symptoms, laboratory studies, neuroimaging, brain biopsy, treatment, and complications were recorded. The long‐term assessment included a phone interview utilizing the Barthel index and a specifically designed cognitive index. Results: Sixteen cases met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 40 years (range 10–66 years) with female:male ratio of 4.3:1 and a mean followup period of 35 months (0–128 months). Headache was the most common presenting symptom, seen in 88% of the cases, followed by focal symptoms (63%), and diffuse symptoms (44%). All patients had highly abnormal cerebral angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were present in 77% (10 of 13). Severe cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities were present in 1 patient (7%). All followup cerebral angiography showed marked improvement. Recovery was demonstrated in 94% of the patients, 6% relapsed, and there were no deaths. Of patients assessed by the Barthel index, 71% showed no disability and 29% had mild disability. Conclusion: There is a PACNS subset characterized by acute presentation (most commonly headache), normal to mildly abnormal CSF findings, female predominance, and highly abnormal cerebral angiography (reversible after treatment), requiring less intensive treatment than has been traditionally used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10797

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Hajj‐Ali, R. A., Furlan, A., Abou‐Chebel, A., & Calabrese, L. H.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
662-669
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W1996361296
Cited by
235
References
0
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10797
The paper
Hajj‐Ali, R. A., Furlan, A., Abou‐Chebel, A., & Calabrese, L. H. (2002). Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: Cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long‐term followup. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10797

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.