Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity: JOINT COUNT IN RA ASSESSMENT

Smolen, Josef S., Eberl, Gabriele, Breedveld, Ferdinand C., Jones, Ieuan, Leeming, Michael, Wylie, Graham L., Kirkpatrick, John·1995·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of the 28-joint count for assessment of joint involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Joint involvement as determined by the 28- and the 66/68-joint count was compared using data from 735 prospectively studied RA patients. RESULTS: The joints included in the 28-joint count were more commonly involved than other joints, and findings from the 28-joint count correlated highly with those from the 66/68-joint count in all analyses. CONCLUSION: The 28-joint count is a reliable and valid measure for joint assessment. It is easier to perform than the 66/68-joint count, and it addresses the joints that are critically involved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780380106

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Smolen, J. S., Eberl, G., Breedveld, F. C., Jones, I., Leeming, M., Wylie, G. L., & Kirkpatrick, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
38-43
ISSN
0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161584352
Cited by
285
References
9
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity: JOINT COUNT IN RA ASSESSMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780380106
The paper
Smolen, J. S., Eberl, G., Breedveld, F. C., Jones, I., Leeming, M., Wylie, G. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. (1995). Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity: JOINT COUNT IN RA ASSESSMENT. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.