The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density
Abstract
Objective. To examine the cross‐sectional association between radiographic features of hip osteoarthritis (OA) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, spine, and appendicular skeleton among Caucasian women ages 65 and older who were participating in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Methods. Pelvis radiographs of 4,855 subjects were assessed for individual radiographic features of hip OA: osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, cysts, and femoral head deformity. Hips were graded on a summary scale of 0 (no OA) to 4 (severe OA) based on the number of radiographic features present. Appendicular BMD was measured in all subjects, and hip and spine BMD in 84% of the group. We used linear regression to examine the association of BMD with hip OA, and to adjust for age, weight, and other determinants of bone mass. Results. Three hundred fifty‐one women (7.2%) had mild (grade 2) and 228 (4.7%) had moderate to severe (grade 3–4) radiographic evidence of hip OA. Women with grade 3–4 hip OA had a higher age‐adjusted BMD at the femoral neck and Ward's triangle (9–10%; P < 0.0001), trochanter (4%; P < 0.01), lumbar spine (8%; P < 0.0001), and distal radius and calcaneus (5%; P < 0.0001 [for each comparison]) compared with those with grade 0–1 OA in the worse hip. Elevations in BMD were greatest in the femoral neck of hips with OA, in women with bilateral hip OA, and in women with hip osteophytes. These findings were essentially unchanged by adjustment for determinants of bone mass. Conclusion. Elderly Caucasian women with moderate to severe radiographic hip OA had higher BMD in the hip, spine, and appendicular skeleton than did women without hip OA. Our findings are consistent with a role of elevated BMD in the pathogenesis of hip OA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Creamer, P., & Hochberg, M. C. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07226-7 · Cited by 394
Self-citationOsteoarthritis and osteoporosis: Clinical and research evidence of inverse relationship
Dequeker, J., Aerssens, J., & Luyten, F. P. (2003) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/bf03327364 · Cited by 269
Fazzalari, N. L., Kuliwaba, J. S., Atkins, G. J., Forwood, M. R., & Findlay, D. M. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1015 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Nevitt, M. C., Lane, N. E., Scott, J. C., Hochberg, M. C., Pressman, A. R., Genant, H. K., & Cummings, S. R.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 907-916
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2107101733
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780380706
- The paper
- Nevitt, M. C., Lane, N. E., Scott, J. C., Hochberg, M. C., Pressman, A. R., Genant, H. K., & Cummings, S. R. (1995). Radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip and bone mineral density. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.