Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety and effectiveness of leflunomide in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

Mladenovic, Vlastimir, Domljan, Zlatko, Rozman, Blaz, Jajic, Ivo, Mihajlovic, Dimitrije, Dordevic, Jovan, Popovic, Milan, Dimitrijevic, Miroslava, Zivkovic, Milutin, Campion, Giles, Musikic, Predrag, Löw‐Friedrich, Iris, Oed, Christine, Seifert, Hildegard, Strand, Vibeke·1995·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective. To assess the safety and effectiveness of leflunomide versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated for 6 months. Methods. Four hundred two patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or leflunomide at 5 mg, 10 mg, or 25 mg daily. A washout period of 6–12 weeks from prior second‐line therapy was required. Results. Statistically significant improvement in primary and secondary outcome measures, as well as by responder analyses, occurred in the 10‐mg and 25‐mg dosage groups compared to placebo. Twenty‐one patients (7.0%) in the active treatment groups withdrew due to adverse events (AEs). The incidence of AEs was higher with leflunomide than with placebo. Gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss, allergic reactions, skin rash, and reversible alopecia were more common in the 10‐mg and 25‐mg dosage groups. The incidence of infections was similar between the treatment and placebo groupsno opportunistic infections were seen. Transient elevations in liver function studies were noted in a small number of patients. Conclusion. Leflunomide is effective in daily doses of 10 mg and 25‐mg in patients with active RA. Improved efficacy at the 25‐mg dose was associated with a higher incidence of AEs. Randomized, placebocontrolled trials using daily doses of 10 mg and 20 mg are under way in the US and Europe to confirm these positive results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780381111

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Mladenovic, V., Domljan, Z., Rozman, B., Jajic, I., Mihajlovic, D., Dordevic, J., Popovic, M., Dimitrijevic, M., Zivkovic, M., Campion, G., Musikic, P., Löw‐Friedrich, I., Oed, C., Seifert, H., & Strand, V.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
1595-1603
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2163155271
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and effectiveness of leflunomide in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780381111
The paper
Mladenovic, V., Domljan, Z., Rozman, B., Jajic, I., Mihajlovic, D., Dordevic, J., Popovic, M., Dimitrijevic, M., Zivkovic, M., Campion, G., Musikic, P., Löw‐Friedrich, I., Oed, C., Seifert, H., & Strand, V. (1995). Safety and effectiveness of leflunomide in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780381111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.