The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and validation of the european league against rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with the preliminary american college of rheumatology and the world health organization/international league against rheumatism criteria
Abstract
Objective. To validate the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and the World Health Organization (WHO)/International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. EULAR response criteria were developed combining change from baseline and level of disease activity attained during followup. In a trial comparing hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine, we studied construct (radiographic progression), criterion (functional capacity), and discriminant validity. Results. EULAR response criteria had good construct, criterion, and discriminant validity. ACR and WHO/ILAR criteria showed only good criterion validity. Conclusion. EULAR response criteria showed better construct and discriminant validity than did the ACR and the WHO/ILAR response criteria for RA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genovese, M. C., McKay, J. D., Nasonov, E. L., Mysler, E. F., da Silva, N. A., Alecock, E., Woodworth, T., & Gomez‐Reino, J. J. (2008) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.23940 · Cited by 855
Nishimoto, N., Yoshizaki, K., Miyasaka, N., Yamamoto, K., Kawai, S., Takeuchi, T., Hashimoto, J., Azuma, J., & Kishimoto, T. (2004) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.20303 · Cited by 788
Comparison of Treatment Strategies in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Trial
Goekoop-Ruiterman, Y. P. M., de Vries-Bouwstra, J. K., Allaart, C. F., van Zeben, D., Kerstens, P. J. S. M., Hazes, J. M. W., Zwinderman, A. H., Peeters, A. J., de Jonge-Bok, J. M., Mallée, C., et al. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00005 · Cited by 448
Therapies for Active Rheumatoid Arthritis after Methotrexate Failure
O'Dell, J. R., Mikuls, T. R., Taylor, T. H., Ahluwalia, V., Brophy, M., Warren, S. R., Lew, R. A., Cannella, A. C., Kunkel, G., Phibbs, C. S., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1303006 · Cited by 382
McInnes, I. B., Sieper, J., Braun, J., Emery, P., van der Heijde, D., Isaacs, J. D., Dahmen, G., Wollenhaupt, J., Schulze-Koops, H., Kogan, J., et al. (2014) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202646 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- van Gestel, A. M., Prevoo, M. L. L., van't Hof, M. A., van Rijswijk, M. H., van de Putte, L. B. A., & van Riel, P. L. C. M.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-40
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2000905503
- Cited by
- 1,572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and validation of the european league against rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with the preliminary american college of rheumatology and the world health organization/international league against rheumatism criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780390105
- The paper
- van Gestel, A. M., Prevoo, M. L. L., van't Hof, M. A., van Rijswijk, M. H., van de Putte, L. B. A., & van Riel, P. L. C. M. (1996). Development and validation of the european league against rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with the preliminary american college of rheumatology and the world health organization/international league against rheumatism criteria. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780390105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
