Cited by 30Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingCancer survivorship and care

Religious and nonreligious coping methods among persons with rheumatoid arthritis

VandeCreek, Larry, Paget, Stephen, Horton, Roberta, Robbins, Laura, Oettinger, Margaret, Tai, Katie·2004·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To examine religious and nonreligious coping methods among persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To identify positive and negative religious coping methods and personal characteristics associated with them. Methods: Persons with RA (n = 181) completed a religious coping questionnaire, 6 subscales from a nonreligious coping inventory, and a depression scale. Results: Religious and nonreligious coping were moderately correlated. The scores of all positive religious coping subscales were positively related to the importance persons attributed to religion. Scores of all negative religious coping subscales were positively associated with self‐reported depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Correlations of religious and nonreligious coping methods were neither completely independent of each other nor functionally redundant, suggesting that each made unique contributions to coping with RA. Persons with no (or few) depressive symptoms who reported that religion was important to them tended to make positive use of their religion as they coped with the emotional stress of RA. A significant number of self‐reported depressive symptoms were correlated with a negative use of religion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When religion forms part of how people cope, the outcome can be positive.

    “When religion forms part of how people cope, the outcome can be positive (see Bjorck & Thurman 2007:159;Vandecreek et al. 2004:50;Wasserman, Weisman & Suro 2013:16).”

    From https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4525 · cites this paper as Vandecreek et al. 2004:50

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 30

Authors
VandeCreek, L., Paget, S., Horton, R., Robbins, L., Oettinger, M., & Tai, K.
Affiliations
  • HealthCare Chaplaincy Network (US)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-05
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W1866851466
Cited by
30
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, religious coping, coping strategies, depression, depressive symptoms, emotional stress, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Mental Healing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Religion and Medicine, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sick Role, Social Adjustment, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review