The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized trial of parenteral methotrexate comparing an intermediate dose with a higher dose in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who failed to respond to standard doses of methotrexate
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) at an intermediate dosage (15 mg/m 2/week) versus a higher dosage (30 mg/m 2/week) in patients with polyarticular‐course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who failed to improve while receiving standard dosages of MTX (8–12.5 mg/m 2/week). Methods: In the screening phase, 595 patients who were newly started on a standard dose of MTX were followed up for 6 months. Subsequently, the nonresponders, defined according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric 30% improvement criteria (pediatric 30), were randomized to receive an intermediate dose or higher dose of parenteral MTX for an additional 6 months. Improvement in the screening and randomization phase was defined by the ACR pediatric 30 response, as well as by the 50% and 70% response levels (ACR pediatric 50 and ACR pediatric 70, respectively). Results: In the screening phase, after receiving standard doses of MTX, 430 patients (72%) improved according to the ACR pediatric 30, while 360 (61%) met the ACR pediatric 50 and 225 (38%) met the ACR pediatric 70; among these patients, 69 (12%) also met the definition of complete disease control. Of the 133 nonresponders, 80 were randomized to receive an intermediate dose or higher dose of MTX. In the randomization phase, the ACR pediatric 30 response rate was 25 of 40 children (62.5%) in the intermediate‐dose group versus 23 of 40 children (57.5%) in the higher‐dose group. An ACR pediatric 50 response rate was attained by 23 patients (57.5%) receiving an intermediate dose versus 22 (55%) in the higher‐dose group. An ACR pediatric 70 response rate was seen in 18 children (45%) receiving an intermediate dose versus 19 (47.5%) receiving a higher dose. Five children (12.5%) in the intermediate‐dose group versus 4 (10%) receiving the higher dose of MTX also met the definition of complete disease control. None of the intergroup differences in response rate were significant. There were no significant differences in the frequency of adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between the 2 randomized groups. Conclusion: This study shows that the plateau of efficacy of MTX in JIA is reached with parenteral administration of 15 mg/m 2/week and that a further increase in dosage is not associated with any additional therapeutic benefit. MTX should be administered for up to 9–12 months to appreciate its full therapeutic effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
Singh, G., Athreya, B. H., Fries, J. F., & Goldsmith, D. P. (1994) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780371209 · Cited by 838
Cited by
Prakken, B., Albani, S., & Martini, A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60244-4 · Cited by 771
Self-citationEfficacy of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric non-infectious uveitis
Wieringa, W. G., Armbrust, W., Legger, G. E., & Los, L. I. (2019) · Ocular Immunology and Inflammation · doi:10.1080/09273948.2018.1529800 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruperto, N., Murray, K. J., Gerloni, V., Wulffraat, N., Feitosa De Oliveira, S. K., Falcini, F., Dolezalova, P., Alessio, M., Burgos‐Vargas, R., Corona, F., Vesely, R., Foster, H., Davidson, J., Zulian, F., Asplin, L., Baildam, E., Consuegra, J. G., Ozdogan, H., Saurenmann, R., Joos, R., Pistorio, A., Woo, P., & Martini, A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2191-2201
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2043306063
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.