Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 644

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: The effect of methotrexate and anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients

Wolfe, Frederick, Michaud, Kaleb·2004·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: The risk of lymphoma is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and spontaneous reporting suggests that methotrexate (MTX) and anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy might be associated independently with an increased risk of lymphoma. However, data from clinical trials and clinical practice do not provide sufficient evidence concerning these issues because of small sample sizes and selected study populations. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for lymphoma in patients with RA and in RA patient subsets by treatment group. Additionally, we sought to determine predictors of lymphoma in RA. Methods: We prospectively studied 18,572 patients with RA who were enrolled in the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases (NDB). Patients were surveyed biannually, and potential lymphoma cases received detailed followup. The SEER (Survey, Epidemiology, and End Results) cancer data resource was used to derive the expected number of cases of lymphoma in a cohort that was comparable in age and sex with the RA cohort. Results: The overall SIR for lymphoma was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.3–2.7). The SIR for biologic use was 2.9 (95% CI 1.7–4.9) and for the use of infliximab (with or without etanercept) was 2.6 (95% CI 1.4–4.5). For etanercept, with or without infliximab, the SIR was 3.8 (95% CI 1.9–7.5). The SIR for MTX was 1.7 (95% CI 0.9–3.2), and was 1.0 (95% CI 0.4–2.5) for those not receiving MTX or biologics. Lymphoma was associated with increasing age, male sex, and education. Conclusion: Lymphomas are increased in RA. Although the SIR is greatest for anti‐TNF therapies, differences between therapies are slight, and confidence intervals for treatment groups overlap. The increased lymphoma rates observed with anti‐TNF therapy may reflect channeling bias, whereby patients with the highest risk of lymphoma preferentially receive anti‐TNF therapy. Current data are insufficient to establish a causal relationship between RA treatments and the development of lymphoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20311

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 644

Metadata

Authors
Wolfe, F., & Michaud, K.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1740-1751
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2045789990
Cited by
644
References
3
FWCI
40.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.