The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 110 wrists in 74 consecutive patients with suspected CTS who had been referred to a tertiary care center. We determined the largest cross‐sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. Because of the lack of a universally accepted reference standard, we first examined the association of sonography with nerve conduction. Then, we compared sonography with a reference standard based on the combination of nerve conduction studies and signs and symptoms. Sonography and reference standard tests were performed independently and interpreted under blinded conditions. Based on a fitted receiver operating characteristic curve, we estimated likelihood ratios (LRs) and posttest probabilities for different cutoffs. Results: There was a high concordance between sonography and nerve conduction. Based on the combined reference standard, a cutoff of 10 mm 2 resulted in approximately equal sensitivity and specificity, but only moderate LRs. A cutoff of <8 mm 2 had satisfactory power to rule out CTS: the fitted‐negative LR was 0.13. Conversely, a cutoff of ≥12 mm 2 had excellent power to rule in CTS, with a fitted‐positive LR of 19.9. For nerves ≥12 mm 2 and a pretest probability of 70% expected in patients with suspected CTS in tertiary care, we found a posttest probability of CTS of 98%. Conclusion: Depending on setting and purpose, different cutoff values for the largest cross‐sectional area may be used to accurately rule in or rule out CTS. Using sonography as a first‐line test may cost‐effectively reduce the number of nerve conduction studies in patients with suspected CTS. A large‐scale, randomized controlled trial is required to determine the effects of sonography on clinical outcomes, the number of nerve conduction studies performed, and the total cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer, J. G. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1061 · Cited by 1,861
Cited by
Fowler, J. R., Gaughan, J. P., & Ilyas, A. M. (2011) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziswiler, H., Reichenbach, S., Vögelin, E., Bachmann, L. M., Villiger, P. M., & Jüni, P.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 304-311
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2051692597
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.20723
- The paper
- Ziswiler, H., Reichenbach, S., Vögelin, E., Bachmann, L. M., Villiger, P. M., & Jüni, P. (2005). Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.