The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether chondroitin sulfate (CS) is effective in inhibiting cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 300 patients with knee OA were recruited from an outpatient clinic, from private practices, and through advertisements. Study patients were randomly assigned to receive either 800 mg CS or placebo once daily for 2 years. The primary outcome was joint space loss over 2 years as assessed by a posteroanterior radiograph of the knee in flexion; secondary outcomes included pain and function. Results: Of 341 patients screened, 300 entered the study and were included in the intent‐to‐treat analysis. The 150 patients receiving placebo had progressive joint space narrowing, with a mean ± SD joint space loss of 0.14 ± 0.61 mm after 2 years (P = 0.001 compared with baseline). In contrast, there was no change in mean joint space width for the 150 patients receiving CS (0.00 ± 0.53 mm; P not significant compared with baseline). Similar results were found for minimum joint space narrowing. The differences in loss of joint space between the two groups were significant for mean joint space width (0.14 ± 0.57 mm; P = 0.04) and for minimum joint space width (0.12 ± 0.52 mm; P = 0.05). CS was well tolerated, with no significant differences in rates of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion: While there was no significant symptomatic effect in this study, long‐term treatment with CS may retard radiographic progression in patients with OA of the knee. However, the clinical relevance of the observed structural results has to be further evaluated, and further studies are needed to confirm the structural effects of CS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Zhang, W., Doherty, M., Leeb, B. F., Alekseeva, L., Arden, N. K., Bijlsma, J. W., Dinçer, F., Dziedzic, K., Häuselmann, H. J., Herrero-Beaumont, G., et al. (2007) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2006.062091 · Cited by 1,338
Metadata
- Authors
- Michel, B. A., Stucki, G., Frey, D., De Vathaire, F., Vignon, E., Bruehlmann, P., & Uebelhart, D.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 779-786
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2042919418
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.