Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Therapeutic efficacy of humanized recombinant anti–interleukin‐6 receptor antibody in children with systemic‐onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Yokota, Shumpei, Miyamae, Takako, Imagawa, Tomoyuki, Iwata, Naomi, Katakura, Shigeki, Mori, Masaaki, Woo, Patricia, Nishimoto, Norihiro, Yoshizaki, Kazuyuki, Kishimoto, Tadamitsu·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of a recombinant human anti–interleukin‐6 (anti–IL‐6) receptor monoclonal antibody (MRA) that indirectly inhibits the effects of IL‐6 in children with systemic‐onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) refractory to high‐dose, long‐term corticosteroids. Methods: An individual escalating‐dose trial was conducted in 11 children with active systemic‐onset JIA who met the inclusion criteria. All were first administered an intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg MRA. Each child without active inflammation was given a second identical dose 2 weeks later and a third identical dose 2 weeks after the second dose. Children with disease flares according to laboratory marker values received a 4‐mg/kg dose. Those without disease flares at this dose received a second 4‐mg/kg dose 2 weeks later and a third 4‐mg/kg dose 2 weeks after the second dose, while those with active inflammation received an additional 3 doses of 8 mg/kg MRA. Efficacy was evaluated every 2 weeks according to responses on the JIA core set of improvement criteria and the results of laboratory tests. Results: MRA abruptly reduced disease activity in 10 of the 11 children, as assessed by the occurrence of febrile episodes, active arthritis, scores on the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire, and levels of acute‐phase reactants. However, levels of inflammatory reactants fluctuated until the proper MRA dose for each child was reached. Two weeks after the third fixed dose of MRA, 90.9% of all patients had a 30% improvement response, 90.9% had a 50% improvement response, and 63.6% had a 70% improvement response. Conclusion: MRA treatment of children with active systemic disease results in clinical improvement and in normalized levels of acute‐phase reactants. MRA was safe and well tolerated and provided greater clinical benefit than conventional corticosteroids, considering the ill effects of IL‐6 and adverse events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20944

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yokota, S., Miyamae, T., Imagawa, T., Iwata, N., Katakura, S., Mori, M., Woo, P., Nishimoto, N., Yoshizaki, K., & Kishimoto, T.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
818-825
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2110995918
Cited by
370
References
0
FWCI
21.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.