Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging

Felson, David T., Niu, Jingbo, Guermazi, Ali, Roemer, Frank, Aliabadi, Piran, Clancy, Margaret, Torner, James, Lewis, C. Elizabeth, Nevitt, Michael C.·2007·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Results of cross‐sectional studies have suggested that bone marrow lesions (BMLs) visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to knee pain, but no longitudinal studies have been done. This study was undertaken to determine whether enlarging BMLs are associated with new knee pain. Methods: Subjects ages 50–79 years with knee osteoarthritis (OA) or at high risk of knee OA were asked twice at baseline about the presence of knee pain, aching, or stiffness (classified as frequent knee pain) on most days; absence of knee pain was the baseline eligibility criterion. At 15 months' followup, subjects were again queried twice about frequent knee pain. A case knee was defined as absence of knee pain at baseline but presence of knee pain both times at followup. Controls were selected randomly from among knees with absence of pain at baseline. All MR images were scored for volume of BMLs in the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral compartments. We focused on the maximal change in BML score among the knee compartments from baseline to 15 months. Multiple logistic regression, with adjustments for demographic and clinical variables, was used to assess whether an increased BML score is predictive of the development of knee pain. Results: Among case knees, 54 of 110 (49.1%) showed an increase in BML score within a compartment, whereas only 59 of 220 control knees (26.8%) showed an increase (P < 0.001 by chi‐square test). A BML score increase of at least 2 units was much more common in case knees than in control knees (27.5% versus 8.6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.5–6.8). Among case knees with increased BMLs, most already had BMLs at baseline, with enlarging BMLs at followup, but among the subset of knees with no BMLs at baseline, new BMLs were more common in case knees (11 [32.4%] of 34) than in control knees (9 [10.8%] of 83). Conclusion: Development of knee pain is associated with an increase in BMLs as revealed on MRI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22851

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Felson, D. T., Niu, J., Guermazi, A., Roemer, F., Aliabadi, P., Clancy, M., Torner, J., Lewis, C. E., & Nevitt, M. C.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-30
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
2986-2992
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2167933345
Cited by
432
References
20
FWCI
19.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22851
The paper
Felson, D. T., Niu, J., Guermazi, A., Roemer, F., Aliabadi, P., Clancy, M., Torner, J., Lewis, C. E., & Nevitt, M. C. (2007). Correlation of the development of knee pain with enlarging bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22851

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.