Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reduced B lymphocyte and immunoglobulin levels after atacicept treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of a multicenter, phase ib, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalating trial

Dall'Era, Maria, Chakravarty, Eliza, Wallace, Daniel, Genovese, Mark, Weisman, Michael, Kavanaugh, Arthur, Kalunian, Kenneth, Dhar, Patricia, Vincent, Emmanuelle, Pena‐Rossi, Claudia, Wofsy, David·2007·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of atacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the biologic effect of atacicept on B lymphocyte and immunoglobulin levels. Atacicept is a TACI‐Ig fusion protein that inhibits B cell stimulation by binding to B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation‐inducing ligand. Methods: This phase Ib, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalating trial comprised 6 cohorts of patients treated with atacicept or placebo in a 3:1 ratio of active drug to placebo (n = 8 per group; n = 7 in cohort 5). Cohorts 1–4 received a single subcutaneous dose of placebo or either 0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 9 mg/kg of atacicept. Cohorts 5 and 6 received weekly doses of placebo or either 1 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg of atacicept for 4 weeks. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks (cohorts 1–4) or 9 weeks (cohorts 5 and 6). Patients with mild‐to‐moderate SLE were enrolled. Results: Biologic activity of atacicept was demonstrated by dose‐dependent reductions in immunoglobulin levels and in mature and total B cell numbers. This effect was most pronounced in the repeated‐dose cohorts and was sustained throughout the followup period. There were no changes in the numbers of T cells, natural killer cells, or monocytes. Mild injection‐site reactions occurred more frequently among the atacicept group than the placebo group. There were no differences in the frequency or type of adverse events and no severe or serious adverse events in patients treated with atacicept. Conclusion: Atacicept administered subcutaneously was well tolerated and demonstrated biologic activity consistent with the proposed mechanism of action.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23047

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Dall'Era, M., Chakravarty, E., Wallace, D., Genovese, M., Weisman, M., Kavanaugh, A., Kalunian, K., Dhar, P., Vincent, E., Pena‐Rossi, C., & Wofsy, D.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-29
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
4142-4150
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1968476672
Cited by
294
References
0
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced B lymphocyte and immunoglobulin levels after atacicept treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of a multicenter, phase ib, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalating trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23047
The paper
Dall'Era, M., Chakravarty, E., Wallace, D., Genovese, M., Weisman, M., Kavanaugh, A., Kalunian, K., Dhar, P., Vincent, E., Pena‐Rossi, C., & Wofsy, D. (2007). Reduced B lymphocyte and immunoglobulin levels after atacicept treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Results of a multicenter, phase ib, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalating trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.