Cited by 70Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationNursing Roles and PracticesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Case management of arthritis patients in primary care: A cluster‐randomized controlled trial

Rosemann, Thomas, Joos, Stefanie, Laux, Gunter, Gensichen, Jochen, Szecsenyi, Joachim·2007·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether providing information on arthritis self‐management through general practitioners (GPs) increases the quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and whether additional case management provided by practice nurses shows better results. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster‐randomized, controlled, 3‐arm trial that included 1,021 patients from 75 primary care practices in Germany. GPs were randomized to intervention group I, group II, or a control group. GPs of both intervention groups participated in 2 peer group meetings. In intervention group II, additional case management was conducted via telephone by a practice nurse. The primary outcome was change in quality of life, assessed by the German version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Short Form (AIMS2‐SF). Secondary outcomes were health service utilization, prescriptions, and physical activity. Data were controlled for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 as a potential confounder. Results: Of 1,125 administered questionnaires, 1,021 were analyzed. Compared with the control group, no significant changes occurred in intervention group I with respect to the primary outcome. Performed radiographs decreased significantly (P = 0.050), whereas prescriptions of acetaminophen increased significantly (P < 0.001). In intervention group II, significant changes in the AIMS2‐SF dimensions social (P < 0.001), symptom (P = 0.048), and lower body (P = 0.049) were identified. Radiographs (P = 0.031) and orthopedic referrals (P = 0.044) decreased whereas prescriptions of pain relievers increased significantly. Conclusion: Improving the quality of life in patients with arthritis using arthritis self‐management seems challenging. Simply providing this information through GPs is not sufficient but combining it with case management seems to be a promising approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23080

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosemann, T., Joos, S., Laux, G., Gensichen, J., & Szecsenyi, J.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-29
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
1390-1397
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W1997737568
Cited by
70
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
osteoarthritis, arthritis self-management, case management, general practitioners, practice nurses, quality of life, health care utilization, pain relievers, orthopedic referral, depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthritis, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Patient Education as Topic, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Radiography, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Case Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review