Case management of arthritis patients in primary care: A cluster‐randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether providing information on arthritis self‐management through general practitioners (GPs) increases the quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and whether additional case management provided by practice nurses shows better results. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster‐randomized, controlled, 3‐arm trial that included 1,021 patients from 75 primary care practices in Germany. GPs were randomized to intervention group I, group II, or a control group. GPs of both intervention groups participated in 2 peer group meetings. In intervention group II, additional case management was conducted via telephone by a practice nurse. The primary outcome was change in quality of life, assessed by the German version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Short Form (AIMS2‐SF). Secondary outcomes were health service utilization, prescriptions, and physical activity. Data were controlled for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 as a potential confounder. Results: Of 1,125 administered questionnaires, 1,021 were analyzed. Compared with the control group, no significant changes occurred in intervention group I with respect to the primary outcome. Performed radiographs decreased significantly (P = 0.050), whereas prescriptions of acetaminophen increased significantly (P < 0.001). In intervention group II, significant changes in the AIMS2‐SF dimensions social (P < 0.001), symptom (P = 0.048), and lower body (P = 0.049) were identified. Radiographs (P = 0.031) and orthopedic referrals (P = 0.044) decreased whereas prescriptions of pain relievers increased significantly. Conclusion: Improving the quality of life in patients with arthritis using arthritis self‐management seems challenging. Simply providing this information through GPs is not sufficient but combining it with case management seems to be a promising approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five studies reported on level of physical activity.
“Five studies reported on level of physical activity”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [83]
No significant between-group differences were reported for physical activity in 4 RCTs.
“No significant between group differences were reported for physical activity in 4 RCTs”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [83]
Cites
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1 · Cited by 4,531 · see citing works
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474 · see citing works
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044 · see citing works
Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., & Gräfe, K. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(03)00198-8 · Cited by 1,558 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Because depression could have a negative influence on the effect of the intervention, it was assessed by means of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (22) to enable it to be controlled as a potential confounder.”
MethodZhang, W., Doherty, M., Leeb, B. F., Alekseeva, L., Arden, N. K., Bijlsma, J. W., Dinçer, F., Dziedzic, K., Häuselmann, H. J., Herrero-Beaumont, G., et al. (2007) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2006.062091 · Cited by 1,338 · see citing works
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults
Chodosh, J., Morton, S. C., Mojica, W., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Hilton, L., Rhodes, S., & Shekelle, P. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007 · Cited by 790 · cited 1× · see citing works
“certain chronic diseases has indicated (5).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
“Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clusterrandomized controlled trials (c-RCTs) assessing SMS interventions with follow-up, delivered by primary HCPs, face-to-face to adult patients with any condition, compared to usual standard of care.”
BackgroundInfluentialProfessional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions
Tzortziou Brown, V., Underwood, M., Mohamed, N., Westwood, O., & Morrissey, D. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007495.pub2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosemann, T., Joos, S., Laux, G., Gensichen, J., & Szecsenyi, J.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1390-1397
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0123
- OpenAlex
- W1997737568
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis, arthritis self-management, case management, general practitioners, practice nurses, quality of life, health care utilization, pain relievers, orthopedic referral, depression
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthritis, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Patient Education as Topic, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Radiography, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Case Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review