The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology of subcutaneous administration of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX). Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a double‐blinded manner to receive injections of placebo plus MTX or 50 mg or 100 mg golimumab every 2 or 4 weeks plus MTX through week 48. Patients originally assigned to receive injections every 2 weeks had the interval increased to every 4 weeks starting at week 20. The primary end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at week 16. The study was powered to detect a difference in the primary end point when the combined golimumab groups and at least 1 of the individual dose groups were compared with placebo. Results: The primary end point was attained. Sixty‐one percent of patients in the combined golimumab plus MTX dose groups achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 compared with 37% of patients in the placebo plus MTX group (P = 0.010). In addition, 79% of patients in the group receiving 100 mg golimumab every 2 weeks achieved an ACR20 response (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Through week 20 (after which patients receiving placebo were switched to active infliximab therapy), serious adverse events were reported in 9% of patients in the combined golimumab groups and in 6% of patients in the placebo group. Conclusion: Golimumab plus MTX effectively reduces the signs and symptoms of RA and is generally well tolerated in patients with an inadequate response to MTX.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genovese, M. C., Greenwald, M., Cho, C., Berman, A., Jin, L., Cameron, G. S., Benichou, O., Xie, L., Braun, D., Berclaz, P., et al. (2014) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.38617 · Cited by 211
Yun, H., Xie, F., Delzell, E., Levitan, E. B., Chen, L., Lewis, J. D., Saag, K. G., Beukelman, T., Winthrop, K. L., Baddley, J. W., et al. (2016) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.39399 · Cited by 152
Furst, D. E., Venkatraman, M. M., McGann, M., Manohar, P. R., Booth-LaForce, C., Sarin, R., Sekar, P. G., Raveendran, K. G., Mahapatra, A., Gopinath, J., et al. (2011) · JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/rhu.0b013e31821c0310 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, J., Matteson, E. L., Dasgupta, B., Nash, P., Durez, P., Hall, S., Hsia, E. C., Han, J., Wagner, C., Xu, Z., Visvanathan, S., & Rahman, M. U.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-27
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 964-975
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2108650270
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23383
- The paper
- Kay, J., Matteson, E. L., Dasgupta, B., Nash, P., Durez, P., Hall, S., Hsia, E. C., Han, J., Wagner, C., Xu, Z., Visvanathan, S., & Rahman, M. U. (2008). Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.