Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiographic findings following two years of infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Heijde, Désirée van der, Landewé, Robert, Baraliakos, Xenofon, Houben, Harry, Tubergen, Astrid van, Williamson, Paul, Xu, Weichun, Baker, Daniel, Goldstein, Neil, Braun, Jürgen·2008·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of infliximab on progression of structural damage over 2 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: In the Ankylosing Spondylitis Study for the Evaluation of Recombinant Infliximab Therapy (ASSERT), a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of the efficacy of infliximab compared with placebo, 279 patients with active AS received either placebo through week 24 and then infliximab 5 mg/kg from week 24 through week 96 (n = 78) or infliximab 5 mg/kg from baseline through week 96, administered every 6 weeks after a loading dose (n = 201; these patients were the focus of the radiographic analyses). Radiographic findings in patients from the ASSERT trial were indistinguishable from those in a historical control cohort of patients who had no prior use of anti–tumor necrosis factor agents (from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study [OASIS] database; n = 192). Radiographic progression of structural damage from baseline to the 2‐year followup was scored using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). All images were scored in one batch. Results: Median changes in the mSASSS from baseline to year 2 were 0.0 for both the OASIS and the ASSERT cohorts (P = 0.541). Mean changes in the mSASSS were also similar between the OASIS and ASSERT cohorts (mean ± SD change over 2 years 1.0 ± 3.2 and 0.9 ± 2.6, respectively). In addition, results from sensitivity analyses did not show a statistically significant difference in the mSASSS between the OASIS and ASSERT cohorts. Conclusion: AS patients who received infliximab from baseline through week 96 did not show a statistically significant difference in inhibition of structural damage progression at year 2, as assessed using the mSASSS scoring system, when compared with radiographic data from the historical control OASIS cohort. Improvements in clinical outcomes and spinal inflammation have been previously demonstrated with the use of infliximab therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23901

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Heijde, D. V. D., Landewé, R., Baraliakos, X., Houben, H., Tubergen, A. V., Williamson, P., Xu, W., Baker, D., Goldstein, N., & Braun, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
58
Issue
10
Pages
3063-3070
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2012643422
Cited by
514
References
0
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiographic findings following two years of infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23901
The paper
Heijde, D. V. D., Landewé, R., Baraliakos, X., Houben, H., Tubergen, A. V., Williamson, P., Xu, W., Baker, D., Goldstein, N., & Braun, J. (2008). Radiographic findings following two years of infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.