The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of fetuses in a study of intravenous immunoglobulin as preventive therapy for congenital heart block: Results of a multicenter, prospective, open‐label clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The recurrence rate of anti‐SSA/Ro–associated congenital heart block (CHB) is 17%. Sustained reversal of third‐degree block has never been achieved. Based on potential reduction of maternal autoantibody titers as well as fetal inflammatory responses, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was evaluated as preventive therapy for CHB. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, open‐label study based on Simon's 2‐stage optimal design was initiated. Enrollment criteria included the presence of anti‐SSA/Ro antibodies in the mother, birth of a previous child with CHB/neonatal lupus rash, current treatment with ≤20 mg/day of prednisone, and <12 weeks pregnant. IVIG (400 mg/kg) was given every 3 weeks from week 12 to week 24 of gestation. The primary outcome was the development of second‐degree or third‐degree CHB. Results: Twenty mothers completed the IVIG protocol before the predetermined stopping rule of 3 cases of advanced CHB in the study was reached. CHB was detected at 19, 20, and 25 weeks; none of the cases occurred following the finding of an abnormal PR interval on fetal Doppler monitoring. One of these mothers had 2 previous children with CHB. One child without CHB developed a transient rash consistent with neonatal lupus. Sixteen children had no manifestations of neonatal lupus at birth. No significant changes in maternal titers of antibody to SSA/Ro, SSB/La, or Ro 52 kd were detected over the course of therapy or at delivery. There were no safety issues. Conclusion: This study establishes the safety of IVIG and the feasibility of recruiting pregnant women who have previously had a child with CHB. However, IVIG at low doses consistent with replacement does not prevent the recurrence of CHB or reduce maternal antibody titers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
Simon, R. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9 · Cited by 3,636
Cited by
Connelly‐Smith, L., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 684
Gordon, C., Amissah-Arthur, M.-B., Gayed, M., Brown, S., Bruce, I. N., D’Cruz, D., Empson, B., Griffiths, B., Jayne, D., Khamashta, M., et al. (2018) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex286 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, D. M., Llanos, C., Izmirly, P. M., Brock, B., Byron, J., Copel, J., Cummiskey, K., Dooley, M. A., Foley, J., Graves, C., Hendershott, C., Kates, R., Komissarova, E. V., Miller, M., Paré, E., Phoon, C. K. L., Prosen, T., Reisner, D., Ruderman, E., Samuels, P., Yu, J. K., Kim, M. Y., & Buyon, J. P.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-30
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1138-1146
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W1981561109
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of fetuses in a study of intravenous immunoglobulin as preventive therapy for congenital heart block: Results of a multicenter, prospective, open‐label clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.27308
- The paper
- Friedman, D. M., Llanos, C., Izmirly, P. M., Brock, B., Byron, J., Copel, J., Cummiskey, K., Dooley, M. A., Foley, J., Graves, C., Hendershott, C., Kates, R., Komissarova, E. V., Miller, M., Paré, E., Phoon, C. K. L., Prosen, T., Reisner, D., Ruderman, E., . . . Buyon, J. P. (2010). Evaluation of fetuses in a study of intravenous immunoglobulin as preventive therapy for congenital heart block: Results of a multicenter, prospective, open‐label clinical trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.