Cited by 254Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Efficacy of the antiphospholipid score for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome and its predictive value for thrombotic events

Otomo, Kotaro, Atsumi, Tatsuya, Amengual, Olga, Fujieda, Yuichiro, Kato, Masaru, Oku, Kenji, Horita, Tetsuya, Yasuda, Shinsuke +1 more·2012·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To define the antiphospholipid score (aPL‐S) by testing multiple antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to evaluate its efficacy for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and predictive value for thrombosis. Methods: This study comprised 2 independent sets of patients with autoimmune diseases. In the first set of patients (n = 233), the aPL profiles were analyzed. Five clotting assays for testing lupus anticoagulant and 6 enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (IgG/IgM anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG/IgM anti–β 2 ‐glycoprotein I, and IgG/IgM phosphatidylserine‐dependent antiprothrombin antibodies) were included. The association of the aPL‐S with a history of thrombosis/pregnancy morbidity was assessed. In the second set of patients (n = 411), the predictive value of the aPL‐S for thrombosis was evaluated retrospectively. Two hundred ninety‐six of these patients were followed up for >2 years. The relationship between the aPL‐S and the risk of developing thrombosis was analyzed. Results: In the first set of patients, the aPL‐S was higher in those with thrombosis/pregnancy morbidity than in those without manifestations of APS ( P < 0.00001). For the aPL‐S, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.752. In the second set of patients, new thromboses developed in 32 patients. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with an aPL‐S of ≥30 was 5.27 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.32–11.95, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, an aPL‐S of ≥30 appeared to be an independent risk factor for thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.144 [95% CI 1.383–7.150], P = 0.006). Conclusion: The aPL‐S is a useful quantitative index for diagnosing APS and may be a predictive marker for thrombosis in autoimmune diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.33340

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antiphospholipid score found that the initial screen was a risk factor, not just the confirmatory test.

    “The antiphospholipid score also found that the initial screen was a risk factor (not just the confirmatory test).17”
  • A Japanese group devised an antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) by testing multiple aPL, including three tests for LA (aPTT, kaolin clotting time and DRVVT) and six antiphospholipid assays (IgG and IgM aCL, IgG and IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I, IgG and IgM aPS-PT) to diagnose APS and to predict the risk of thrombosis.

    “A Japanese group devised an antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) by testing multiple aPL, including three tests for LA (aPTT, kaolin clotting time and DRVVT) and six antiphospholipid assays (IgG and IgM aCL, IgG and IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I, IgG and IgM aPS-PT) to diagnose APS and to predict the risk of thrombosis [35].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 254

Authors
Otomo, K., Atsumi, T., Amengual, O., Fujieda, Y., Kato, M., Oku, K., Horita, T., Yasuda, S., & Koike, T.
Affiliations
Hokkaido University (JP)
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-27
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
504-512
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1992631495
Cited by
254
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21591258, 23591431, 24591436)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, thrombosis, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, anti-prothrombin antibodies, pregnancy morbidity, thrombosis risk prediction, autoimmune disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Glycoproteins, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Prothrombin, Retrospective Studies, Thrombosis, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review