Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibodies in the United States

Open access
Satoh, Minoru, Chan, Edward K. L., Ho, Lindsey A., Rose, Kathryn M., Parks, Christine G., Cohn, Richard D., Jusko, Todd A., Walker, Nigel J., Germolec, Dori R., Whitt, Irene Z., Crockett, Patrick W., Pauley, Brad A., Chan, Jason Y. F., Ross, Steven J., Birnbaum, Linda S., Zeldin, Darryl C., Miller, Frederick W.·2012·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence, types, and sociodemographic and biobehavioral correlates of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) in the US. Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional analysis of 4,754 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. ANAs were assessed by indirect immunofluorescence. In ANA‐positive individuals, cellular staining patterns were determined, and specific autoantibody reactivities were assessed by immunoprecipitation. Results: The ANA prevalence in the US population of individuals ages 12 years and older was 13.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 12.2–15.5%). ANA prevalence increased with age ( P = 0.01), and ANAs were more prevalent among females than males (17.8% versus 9.6%; P < 0.001), with the female‐to‐male ratio peaking at 40–49 years of age. ANA prevalence was modestly higher in African Americans compared with whites (age‐adjusted prevalence odds ratio [POR] 1.30, 95% CI 1.00–1.70). Remarkably, ANAs were less common in overweight and obese individuals (age‐adjusted POR 0.74) than in persons of normal weight. No significant associations of ANA with education, family income, alcohol use, smoking history, serum levels of cotinine, or C‐reactive protein were observed. In ANA‐positive individuals, nuclear patterns were seen in 84.6%, cytoplasmic patterns were seen in 21.8%, and nucleolar patterns were seen in 6.1%; the most common specific autoantibodies were anti‐Ro (3.9%) and anti‐Su (2.4%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that more than 32 million persons in the US have ANAs, and that the prevalence is higher among females, older individuals, African Americans, and those with a normal body weight. These data will serve as a useful baseline for future investigations of predictors and changes in ANA prevalence over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.34380

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Satoh, M., Chan, E. K. L., Ho, L. A., Rose, K. M., Parks, C. G., Cohn, R. D., Jusko, T. A., Walker, N. J., Germolec, D. R., Whitt, I. Z., Crockett, P. W., Pauley, B. A., Chan, J. Y. F., Ross, S. J., Birnbaum, L. S., Zeldin, D. C., & Miller, F. W.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
2319-2327
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1985031981
Cited by
448
References
3
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibodies in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.34380
The paper
Satoh, M., Chan, E. K. L., Ho, L. A., Rose, K. M., Parks, C. G., Cohn, R. D., Jusko, T. A., Walker, N. J., Germolec, D. R., Whitt, I. Z., Crockett, P. W., Pauley, B. A., Chan, J. Y. F., Ross, S. J., Birnbaum, L. S., Zeldin, D. C., & Miller, F. W. (2012). Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibodies in the United States. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.