Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Large National Cohort of French Patients With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteitis

Wipff, J., Costantino, F., Lemelle, I., Pajot, C., Duquesne, A., Lorrot, M., Faye, A., Bader‐Meunier, B., Brochard, K., Despert, V., Jean, S., Grall‐Lerosey, M., Marot, Y., Nouar, D., Pagnier, A., Quartier, P., Job‐Deslandre, C.·2015·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: To document more fully the characteristics of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) in pediatric patients, to collect data on the outcomes and management of the disease, and to define prognostic factors. Methods: One hundred seventy‐eight patients were included (123 female patients and 55 male patients), with a mean ± SD age at diagnosis of 10.9 ± 2.9 years. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of CRMO, evidence of at least one lesion of osteitis confirmed by imaging, and development of the syndrome before age 18 years. Results: Longitudinal clinical and imaging studies revealed that only 12 of 178 CRMO patients (7%) had unifocal lesions at the last medical visit. We were able to apply the clinical chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis score to 110 of 178 patients (62%), which indicated that bone biopsy could have been avoided in 27 cases (25%). At the last medical visit, disease was in remission in only 73 of 171 patients (43%) (41% receiving therapy) after a mean ± SD of 47.9 ± 38.9 months; 44 of 171 patients (26%) experienced sequelae. Using cluster analysis, the CRMO cohort was separated into 3 homogeneous phenotypes (severe, mild, and intermediate). Patients with the severe phenotype had the worst prognosis. This group was entirely composed of male patients, most of whom had the multifocal form of CRMO and inflammatory syndrome. Patients with the mild phenotype had the best prognosis. This group was primarily composed of female patients with a unifocal form of CRMO and infrequent clavicle involvement and inflammatory syndrome. Patients with the intermediate phenotype had a good prognosis but greater reliance on treatment. This group primarily included female patients with multifocal lesions and inflammatory syndrome. Conclusion: This is the largest CRMO cohort described in the literature to date. Clinical evolution and imaging investigations confirmed the multifocal pattern of the disease. Three distinct subgroups of CRMO patients were distinguished, with very different prognoses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39013

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Metadata

Authors
Wipff, J., Costantino, F., Lemelle, I., Pajot, C., Duquesne, A., Lorrot, M., Faye, A., Bader‐Meunier, B., Brochard, K., Despert, V., Jean, S., Grall‐Lerosey, M., Marot, Y., Nouar, D., Pagnier, A., Quartier, P., & Job‐Deslandre, C.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
1128-1137
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W1915140285
Cited by
271
References
17
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large National Cohort of French Patients With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.39013
The paper
Wipff, J., Costantino, F., Lemelle, I., Pajot, C., Duquesne, A., Lorrot, M., Faye, A., Bader‐Meunier, B., Brochard, K., Despert, V., Jean, S., Grall‐Lerosey, M., Marot, Y., Nouar, D., Pagnier, A., Quartier, P., & Job‐Deslandre, C. (2015). A Large National Cohort of French Patients With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteitis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.