The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare
Abstract
Objective: The risks of hospitalized infection associated with biologic agents used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether the associated risk of hospitalized infections differed between specific biologic agents used to treat RA. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study using Medicare data from 2006–2011 for all enrolled patients with RA, new episodes of treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab were identified. Patients were required to have received another biologic agent previously and to have been continuously enrolled in Medicare medical and pharmacy plans during the baseline period and throughout followup. Followup started on the date of initiation of treatment with the new biologic agent (after previous treatment with a different biologic agent) and ended on the date of the earliest hospitalized infection, at 12 months, after an exposure gap of >30 days, or at the time of death or loss of Medicare coverage. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for hospitalized infection, adjusting for an infection risk score and other confounders. Results: Of 31,801 new biologic treatment episodes in patients who had previously received another biologic agent, 12.0% were with etanercept, 15.2% with adalimumab, 5.9% with certolizumab, 4.4% with golimumab, 12.4% with infliximab, 28.9% with abatacept, 14.8% with rituximab, and 6.3% with tocilizumab. During followup, we identified 2,530 hospitalized infections; incidence rates ranged from 13.1 per 100 person‐years (abatacept) to 18.7 per 100 person‐years (rituximab). After adjustment, etanercept (HR 1.24, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.07–1.45), infliximab (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.21–1.60), and rituximab (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21–1.53) had significantly higher HRs for hospitalized infection compared with abatacept. Conclusion: In RA patients with prior exposure to a biologic agent, exposure to etanercept, infliximab, or rituximab was associated with a greater 1‐year risk of hospitalized infection compared with the risk associated with exposure to abatacept.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a US Medicare cohort study that included 31,801 new biologic treatment episodes showed that, compared with the rate of hospitalized infections associated with abatacept, the rate associated with tocilizumab was not significantly higher, but the rates associated with etanercept, infliximab, and rituximab were”
From Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic (2019) · cites this paper as Yun et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.044 · DOI
- 10.1093/rheumatology/kes283 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.20217 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.20568 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.295.19.2275 · DOI
- Singh JA, 2011, Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta‐analysis and Cochrane overview, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD008794
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15640-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/ard.2005.043299 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.20159 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.10697 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.23383 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.2008.099291 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-144-12-200606200-00003 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22070 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.21778 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22025 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2011.1692 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22504 · DOI
- 10.1002/acr.22281 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.21386 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22808 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.21978 · DOI
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201108 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.2010.146365 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1002/pds.3231 · DOI
- 10.1002/acr.21805 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.10529 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1503/cmaj.091391 · DOI
- Singh JA, 2009, Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD007848
- Capell HA., 2001, Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: longterm safety issues, J Rheumatol Suppl, 62, 10
- 10.1002/art.23050 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.2009.118935 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.12.024 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22600 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01715.x · DOI
- 10.2174/157339711794474620 · DOI
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201338 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.2011.151043 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22544 · DOI
- Curtis JR, 2005, Validation of claims‐identified serious adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease patients [poster], Arthritis Rheum, 52, 4085
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204011 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic
Kang, S., Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.026 · Cited by 904
Metadata
- Authors
- Yun, H., Xie, F., Delzell, E., Levitan, E. B., Chen, L., Lewis, J. D., Saag, K. G., Beukelman, T., Winthrop, K. L., Baddley, J. W., & Curtis, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-23
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-66
- ISSN
- 2326-5191
- 2326-5205
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01-HS-018517, 1 K12-HS-021694)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review