The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brief Report: Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tofacitinib, Tocilizumab, or Other Biologic Treatments
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) perforation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tofacitinib, tocilizumab, or other biologic agents. Methods: Using health plan data from 2006 through 2014, RA patients without prior GI perforation were identified. Those in whom treatment with tofacitinib or a biologic agent was being initiated were followed up for incident GI perforation with hospitalization. Crude incidence rates were calculated by exposure. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between GI perforation and exposures. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Results: A cohort of 167,113 RA patients was analyzed. Among them, 4,755 began treatment with tofacitinib, 11,705 with tocilizumab, 115,047 with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), 31,214 with abatacept, and 4,392 with rituximab. Compared to TNFi recipients, abatacept recipients were older, tofacitinib and rituximab recipients were younger, and tocilizumab recipients were similar in age. Patients beginning treatment with a non‐TNFi agent were more likely to have previously received biologic agents than patients beginning treatment with a TNFi. The incidence of GI perforation per 1,000 patient‐years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.55 (tocilizumab), 1.07 (abatacept), 0.73 (rituximab), and 0.83 (TNFi). Most perforations occurred in the lower GI tract: the incidence of lower GI tract perforation per 1,000 patient‐years was 0.86 (tofacitinib), 1.26 (tocilizumab), 0.76 (abatacept), 0.48 (rituximab), and 0.46 (TNFi). Lower GI tract perforation risk was significantly elevated with tocilizumab treatment, and numerically elevated with tofacitinib treatment, versus treatment with TNFi. Adjusted HRs were 2.51 (95% CI 1.31–4.80) for tocilizumab and 1.94 (95% CI 0.49–7.65) for tofacitinib. Older age (HR 1.16 per 5 years [95% CI 1.10–1.22]), diverticulitis/other GI conditions (HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.62–6.50]), and prednisone use at >7.5 mg/day (HR 2.29 [95% CI 1.39–3.78]) were associated with lower GI tract perforation. The incidence of upper GI tract perforation was similar among all drug exposures. Conclusion: The risk of lower GI tract perforation associated with tocilizumab treatment, and possibly tofacitinib treatment, is elevated compared to that associated with TNF blockade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the rates of gastrointestinal perforation and lower intestinal perforation were 1.8–2.8 and 1.26–2.7 per 1,000 patient years (PYs), respectively, in tocilizumab-treated RA patients; both values were significantly higher than in TNF-inhibitor-treated patients (0.6–0.9 and 0.2–0.76/1,000 PYs, respectively) (Strangfeld et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2016”
From Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic (2019) · cites this paper as Xie et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Lin, D. Y., & Wei, L. J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874 · Cited by 2,695
Lanas, A., García-Rodríguez, L. A., Arroyo, M. T., Gomollón, F., Feu, F., González-Pérez, A., Zapata, E., Bástida, G., Rodrigo, L., Santolaria, S., et al. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.080754 · Cited by 524
A unified approach to measuring the effect size between two groups using SAS
Yang, D., & Dalton, J. E. (2012) · Cited by 419
Integrated safety in tocilizumab clinical trials
Schiff, M. H., Kremer, J. M., Jahreis, A., Vernon, E., Isaacs, J. D., & van Vollenhoven, R. F. (2011) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar3455 · Cited by 367
Serious lower gastrointestinal clinical events with nonselective NSAID or coxib use
Laine, L., Connors, L. G., Reicin, A., Hawkey, C. J., Burgos–Vargas, R., Schnitzer, T. J., Yu, Q., & Bombardier, C. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50054 · Cited by 355
Lanas, Á., Carrera-Lasfuentes, P., Arguedas, Y., García, S., Bujanda, L., Calvet, X., Ponce, J., Perez-Aísa, Á., Castro, M., Muñoz, M., et al. (2015) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.11.007 · Cited by 269
Validation of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in health care utilization data
Kim, S. C., Servi, A. D., Polinski, J. M., Mogun, H., Weinblatt, M. E., Katz, J. N., & Solomon, D. H. (2011) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar3260 · Cited by 229
Strangfeld, A., Richter, A., Siegmund, B., Herzer, P., Rockwitz, K., Demary, W., Aringer, M., Meißner, Y., Zink, A., & Listing, J. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209773 · Cited by 174
Palmer, R. H. (2015) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.025 · Cited by 165
Gout, T., Östör, A. J. K., & Nisar, M. K. (2011) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-011-1827-x · Cited by 125
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lee EB, 2013, Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor: analysis of gastrointestinal adverse events across the rheumatoid arthritis clinical program [abstract], Arthritis Rheum, 65, S191
Cited by
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic
Hu, X., li, J., Fu, M., Zhao, X., & Wang, W. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1 · Cited by 2,633
JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases
Schwartz, D. M., Kanno, Y., Villarino, A., Ward, M., Gadina, M., & O'Shea, J. J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.201 · Cited by 1,266
Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic
Kang, S., Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.026 · Cited by 904
The role of IL-6 in host defence against infections: immunobiology and clinical implications
Rose-John, S., Winthrop, K., & Calabrese, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2017.83 · Cited by 424
Tocilizumab: A review in rheumatoid arthritis
Scott, L. J. (2017) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-017-0829-7 · Cited by 419
Gastrointestinal perforation secondary to COVID-19: Case reports and literature review
Al Argan, R. J., Alqatari, S. G., Al Said, A. H., Alsulaiman, R. M., Noor, A., Al Sheekh, L. A., & Al Beladi, F. H. (2021) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000025771 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, F., Yun, H., Bernatsky, S., & Curtis, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10-27
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2612-2617
- ISSN
- 2326-5191
- 2326-5205
- PMC
- PMC5538140
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the NIH (P60-AR-064172)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.