Risk of knee osteoarthritis with obesity, sarcopenic obesity, and sarcopenia
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Obesity, defined by anthropometric measures, is a well‐known risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but there is a relative paucity of data regarding the association of body composition (fat and muscle mass) with risk of knee OA. We undertook this study to examine the longitudinal association of body composition categories based on fat and muscle mass with risk of incident knee OA. Methods: We included participants from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, a longitudinal cohort of individuals with or at risk of knee OA. Based on body composition (i.e., fat and muscle mass) from whole‐body dual x‐ray absorptiometry, subjects were categorized as obese nonsarcopenic (obese), sarcopenic obese, sarcopenic nonobese (sarcopenic), or nonsarcopenic nonobese (the referent category). We examined the relationship of baseline body composition categories with the risk of incident radiographic OA at 60 months using binomial regression with robust variance estimation, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Among 1,653 subjects without radiographic knee OA at baseline, significantly increased risk of incident radiographic knee OA was found among obese women (relative risk [RR] 2.29 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} 1.64–3.20]), obese men (RR 1.73 [95% CI 1.08–2.78]), and sarcopenic obese women (RR 2.09 [95% CI 1.17–3.73]), but not among sarcopenic obese men (RR 1.74 [95% CI 0.68–4.46]). Sarcopenia was not associated with risk of knee OA (for women, RR 0.96 [95% CI 0.62–1.49]; for men, RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.34–1.30]). Conclusion: In this large longitudinal cohort, we found body composition–based obesity and sarcopenic obesity, but not sarcopenia, to be associated with risk of knee OA. Weight loss strategies for knee OA should focus on obesity and sarcopenic obesity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surgical interventions, including total joint replacements, are considered the standard of care for advanced osteoarthritis.
“Surgical interventions, including total joint replacements, are considered the standard of care for advanced OA [11].”
From Picroside II suppresses chondrocyte pyroptosis through MAPK/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway alleviates osteoarthritis (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
The Methods (Study sample and Outcome; page not provided) examine risk factors for new-onset radiographic knee osteoarthritis, not treatment of advanced disease. Searches for total joint replacement, arthroplasty, and surgery found no passage stating that surgical intervention is the standard of care for advanced osteoarthritis. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLoss of muscle mass and strength makes a higher risk of osteoarthritis, which exacerbates physical inactivity, worsening both physical and mental health.
“As the loss of muscle mass and strength makes a higher risk of osteoarthritis (63, 64), this exacerbates physical inactivity, worsening both physical and mental health.”
From Diabetes and Sarcopenic Obesity: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatments (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 209
- Authors
- Misra, D., Fielding, R. A., Felson, D. T., Niu, J., Brown, C., Nevitt, M., Lewis, C. E., Torner, J., Neogi, T., & study, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Misra, Devyani
- ORCID
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-04
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232-237
- ISSN
- 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
- 2326-5205
- PMC
- PMC6374038
- OpenAlex
- W2886143042
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Arthritis & Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Rheumatology Research Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, obesity, sarcopenic obesity, sarcopenia, body composition, fat mass, muscle mass, sex differences, radiographic osteoarthritis, weight loss
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Aged, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Absorptiometry, Photon, Incidence, Muscle, Skeletal, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review