The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sentiment strength detection for the social web
Abstract
Sentiment analysis is concerned with the automatic extraction of sentiment‐related information from text. Although most sentiment analysis addresses commercial tasks, such as extracting opinions from product reviews, there is increasing interest in the affective dimension of the social web, and Twitter in particular. Most sentiment analysis algorithms are not ideally suited to this task because they exploit indirect indicators of sentiment that can reflect genre or topic instead. Hence, such algorithms used to process social web texts can identify spurious sentiment patterns caused by topics rather than affective phenomena. This article assesses an improved version of the algorithm SentiStrength for sentiment strength detection across the social web that primarily uses direct indications of sentiment. The results from six diverse social web data sets (MySpace, Twitter, YouTube, Digg, Runners World, BBC Forums) indicate that SentiStrength 2 is successful in the sense of performing better than a baseline approach for all data sets in both supervised and unsupervised cases. SentiStrength is not always better than machine‐learning approaches that exploit indirect indicators of sentiment, however, and is particularly weaker for positive sentiment in news‐related discussions. Overall, the results suggest that, even unsupervised, SentiStrength is robust enough to be applied to a wide variety of different social web contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The accuracy of this method has been published previously [69].”
From Safety of creatine supplementation: analysis of the prevalence of reported side effects in clinical trials and adverse event reports (2025) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,543
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,346
Witten, I. H. (2008) · Cited by 9,143
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000011 · Cited by 6,372
Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning
Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J. C., & Smola, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.5555/299094 · Cited by 5,809
Making Large-Scale SVM Learning PracticalPreprint
Joachims, T. (1998) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.17877/de290r-14262 · Cited by 4,517
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,646
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/47akcj8foo4d · Cited by 2,784
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Andreevskaia A., 2008, Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL '08: HLT), 290
- Aue A., 2005, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing
- Baccianella S., 2010, Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation
- Diakopoulos N.A., 2010, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, 1195
- Kramer A.D.I., 2010, Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 287
- Mishne G.(2005).Experiments with mood classification in Blog posts. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Stylistic Analysis of Text for Information. Retrieved fromhttp://staff.science.uva.nl/∼gilad/pubs/style2005‐blogmoods.pdf
- Mishne G., 2006, Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs (AAAI‐CAAW), 145
- O'Connor B., 2010, Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 122
- Strapparava C., 2004, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1083
- Taboada M., 2004, Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text (AAAI Technical Report SS‐04–07), 158
- Turney P.D., 2002, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '02), 417
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Metadata
- Authors
- Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- ORCID
- Thelwall, Mike
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-13
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-173
- ISSN
- 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2890
- OpenAlex
- W1987425720
- Cited by
- 1,062
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 39.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Seventh Framework Programme
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- SentiStrength, Web 2.0, Twitter, unsupervised sentiment analysis, online forums, user-generated content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review