The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?
Open accessAbstract
R esearch G ate is a social network site for academics to create their own profiles, list their publications, and interact with each other. Like Academia.edu, it provides a new way for scholars to disseminate their work and hence potentially changes the dynamics of informal scholarly communication. This article assesses whether R esearch G ate usage and publication data broadly reflect existing academic hierarchies and whether individual countries are set to benefit or lose out from the site. The results show that rankings based on R esearch G ate statistics correlate moderately well with other rankings of academic institutions, suggesting that R esearch G ate use broadly reflects the traditional distribution of academic capital. Moreover, while B razil, I ndia, and some other countries seem to be disproportionately taking advantage of R esearch G ate, academics in C hina, S outh K orea, and R ussia may be missing opportunities to use R esearch G ate to maximize the academic impact of their publications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 · Cited by 907
Self-citationDo open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature
CRAIG, I., PLUME, A., MCVEIGH, M., PRINGLE, J., & AMIN, M. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers
Farsi, D. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23205 · Cited by 299
Xia, F., Wang, W., Bekele, T. M., & Liu, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2016.2641460 · Cited by 266
The Impact of Author-Selected Keywords on Citation Counts
Uddin, S., & Khan, A. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.004 · Cited by 143
Wang, G., He, Y., Huang, Z., & Kumar, S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2512532
Metadata
- Authors
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-23
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 876-889
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W1758588624
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/asi.23236
- The paper
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.