The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revised equipartition and minimum energy formula for magnetic field strength estimates from radio synchrotron observations
Open accessAbstract
The commonly used classical equipartition or minimum‐energy estimate of total magnetic fields strengths from radio synchrotron intensities is of limited practical use because it is based on the hardly known ratio K of the total energies of cosmic ray protons and electrons and also has inherent problems. We present a revised formula, using the number density ratio K for which we give estimates. For particle acceleration in strong shocks K is about 40 and increases with decreasing shock strength. Our revised estimate for the field strength gives larger values than the classical estimate for flat radio spectra with spectral indices of about 0.5–0.6, but smaller values for steep spectra and total fields stronger than about 10 µG. In very young supernova remnants, for example, the classical estimate may be too large by up to 10×. On the other hand, if energy losses of cosmic ray electrons are important, K increases with particle energy and the equipartition field may be underestimated significantly. Our revised larger equipartition estimates in galaxy clusters and radio lobes are consistent with independent estimates from Faraday rotation measures, while estimates from the ratio between radio synchrotron and X‐ray inverse Compton intensities generally give much weaker fields. This may be explained e.g. by a concentration of the field in filaments. Our revised field strengths may also lead to major revisions of electron lifetimes in jets and radio lobes estimated from the synchrotron break frequency in the radio spectrum. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cosmic-Ray Propagation and Interactions in the Galaxy
Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Ptuskin, V. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123011 · Cited by 1,161
Murphy, E. J., Condon, J. J., Schinnerer, E., Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Helou, G., Turner, J. L., Aniano, G., Beirão, P., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/67 · Cited by 852
The Astrophysics of Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays
Kotera, K., & Olinto, A. V. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102620 · Cited by 470
Magnetic fields and spiral arms in the galaxy M51: Magnetic fields and spiral arms in M51
Fletcher, A., Beck, R., Shukurov, A., Berkhuijsen, E. M., & Horellou, C. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18065.x · Cited by 269
Self-citationGiant magnetized outflows from the centre of the Milky Way
Carretti, E., Crocker, R. M., Staveley-Smith, L., Haverkorn, M., Purcell, C., Gaensler, B. M., Bernardi, G., Kesteven, M. J., & Poppi, S. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11734 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, R., & Krause, M.
- Venue
- Astronomische Nachrichten
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-24
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 414-427
- ISSN
- 0004-6337 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3994
- OpenAlex
- W2034442266
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised equipartition and minimum energy formula for magnetic field strength estimates from radio synchrotron observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/asna.200510366
- The paper
- Beck, R., & Krause, M. (2005). Revised equipartition and minimum energy formula for magnetic field strength estimates from radio synchrotron observations. Astronomische Nachrichten. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200510366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.