Cited by 108Williams Syndrome ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Haploinsufficiency of Gtf2i, a gene deleted in Williams Syndrome, leads to increases in social interactions

Sakurai, Takeshi, Dorr, Nathan P., Takahashi, Nagahide, McInnes, L. Alison, Elder, Gregory A., Buxbaum, Joseph D.·2011·Autism Research

Abstract

Identifying genes involved in social behavior is important for autism research. Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a developmental syndrome with unique neurocognitive features, including low IQ, deficits in visuospatial and visual-motor abilities, hypersensitivity to sounds, hypersociability, and increased general anxiety. The syndrome is caused by a recurrent hemizygous deletion of the 7q11.23 region, containing about 28 genes. One of genes in the region, GTF2I, has been implicated in the hypersociability and visuospatial deficits of WBS based on genotype-phenotype correlation studies of patients with atypical deletions. In order to clarify the involvement of GTF2I in neurocognitive function, especially social behavior, we have developed and characterized Gtf2i-deficient mice. We found that homozygous deletion of Gtf2i causes lethality during embryonic development with neural tube closure defects and exencephaly, consistent with other reports. Gtf2i heterozygous animals show no gross changes in brain structure or development. Furthermore, heterozygous animals show no alterations in learning and memory, including spatial memory as assessed by the Morris water maze, but show alterations in the recognition of novel objects. Interestingly, they show increased social interaction with unfamiliar mice and do not show typical social habituation processes, reminiscent of the hypersociability observed in WBS patients. The mice do not appear to show increased anxiety, supporting a speci…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.169

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 108

Authors
Sakurai, T., Dorr, N. P., Takahashi, N., McInnes, L. A., Elder, G. A., & Buxbaum, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Buxbaum, Joseph D.
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
28-39
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2091486882
Cited by
108
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
GTF2I, Williams syndrome, haploinsufficiency, hypersociability, social behavior, 7q11.23 deletion, neural tube defects, exencephaly, novel object recognition, social interaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Child, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Nerve Net, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Social Behavior, Mice, Knockout, Williams Syndrome, Embryo Loss, Mice, Haploinsufficiency, Hemizygote

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review