Probabilistic reinforcement learning in adults with autism spectrum disorders
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) can be conceptualized as disorders of learning, however there have been few experimental studies taking this perspective. METHODS: We examined the probabilistic reinforcement learning performance of 28 adults with ASDs and 30 typically developing adults on a task requiring learning relationships between three stimulus pairs consisting of Japanese characters with feedback that was valid with different probabilities (80%, 70%, and 60%). Both univariate and Bayesian state-space data analytic methods were employed. Hypotheses were based on the extant literature as well as on neurobiological and computational models of reinforcement learning. RESULTS: Both groups learned the task after training. However, there were group differences in early learning in the first task block where individuals with ASDs acquired the most frequently accurately reinforced stimulus pair (80%) comparably to typically developing individuals; exhibited poorer acquisition of the less frequently reinforced 70% pair as assessed by state-space learning curves; and outperformed typically developing individuals on the near chance (60%) pair. Individuals with ASDs also demonstrated deficits in using positive feedback to exploit rewarded choices. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the contention that individuals with ASDs are slower learners. Based on neurobiology and on the results of computational modeling, one interpretation of this pattern of findings is that impairments are related to deficits in flexible updating of reinforcement history as mediated by the orbito-frontal cortex, with spared functioning of the basal ganglia. This hypothesis about the pathophysiology of learning in ASDs can be tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The deficit in reward learning and its link to social skills persists through adulthood, as evidenced by impairments in rapid formation of reward-stimulus associations and its correlation with clinical symptoms of social dysfunction.
“Interestingly, the deficit in reward learning (and its link to social skills) seems to persist through to adulthood, as evidenced by impairments in the rapid formation of reward–stimulus associations and its correlation with clinical symptoms of social dysfunction [37-39].”
From Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications (2012) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 97
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ozonoff S Griffith EM 2000 Neuropsychological function and the external validity of Asperger syndrome Klin A Volkmar FR Sparrow SS Asperger syndrome New York Guilford Press 24
- Pennington BF 2002 The development of psychopathology (illustrated ed) New York The Guilford Press 380
- Authors
- Solomon, M., Smith, A. C., Frank, M. J., Ly, S., & Carter, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solomon, Marjorie
- Venue
- Autism Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-18
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5538882
- OpenAlex
- W2070618183
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Autism Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Autism Speaks (AS1461)
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- U.S. Public Health Service (R-01 071847)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH074967)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, probabilistic reinforcement learning, learning deficits, orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia, computational models of learning, autistic adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Male, Probability Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis, Asperger Syndrome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review