Cited by 97Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

Probabilistic reinforcement learning in adults with autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Solomon, Marjorie, Smith, Anne C., Frank, Michael J., Ly, Stanford, Carter, Cameron S.·2011·Autism Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) can be conceptualized as disorders of learning, however there have been few experimental studies taking this perspective. METHODS: We examined the probabilistic reinforcement learning performance of 28 adults with ASDs and 30 typically developing adults on a task requiring learning relationships between three stimulus pairs consisting of Japanese characters with feedback that was valid with different probabilities (80%, 70%, and 60%). Both univariate and Bayesian state-space data analytic methods were employed. Hypotheses were based on the extant literature as well as on neurobiological and computational models of reinforcement learning. RESULTS: Both groups learned the task after training. However, there were group differences in early learning in the first task block where individuals with ASDs acquired the most frequently accurately reinforced stimulus pair (80%) comparably to typically developing individuals; exhibited poorer acquisition of the less frequently reinforced 70% pair as assessed by state-space learning curves; and outperformed typically developing individuals on the near chance (60%) pair. Individuals with ASDs also demonstrated deficits in using positive feedback to exploit rewarded choices. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the contention that individuals with ASDs are slower learners. Based on neurobiology and on the results of computational modeling, one interpretation of this pattern of findings is that impairments are related to deficits in flexible updating of reinforcement history as mediated by the orbito-frontal cortex, with spared functioning of the basal ganglia. This hypothesis about the pathophysiology of learning in ASDs can be tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.177

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The deficit in reward learning and its link to social skills persists through adulthood, as evidenced by impairments in rapid formation of reward-stimulus associations and its correlation with clinical symptoms of social dysfunction.

    “Interestingly, the deficit in reward learning (and its link to social skills) seems to persist through to adulthood, as evidenced by impairments in the rapid formation of reward–stimulus associations and its correlation with clinical symptoms of social dysfunction [37-39].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 97

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ozonoff S Griffith EM 2000 Neuropsychological function and the external validity of Asperger syndrome Klin A Volkmar FR Sparrow SS Asperger syndrome New York Guilford Press 24
  2. Pennington BF 2002 The development of psychopathology (illustrated ed) New York The Guilford Press 380

Authors
Solomon, M., Smith, A. C., Frank, M. J., Ly, S., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Solomon, Marjorie
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-18
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
109-120
ISSN
1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070618183
Cited by
97
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (AS1461)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R-01 071847)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH074967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, probabilistic reinforcement learning, learning deficits, orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia, computational models of learning, autistic adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Male, Probability Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis, Asperger Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review