Screening for autism spectrum disorder in a naturalistic home setting using the Systematic Observation of Red Flags (SORF) at 18–24 months.
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the Systematic Observation of Red Flags (SORF; Dow et al., 2016) as a level 2 screener for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in toddlers during a naturalistic video‐recorded home observation. Psychometric properties of the SORF were examined in a sample of 228 toddlers—84 with ASD, 82 with developmental delay (DD), and 62 with typical development (TD). Trained undergraduate research assistants blind to diagnosis rated 22 red flags (RF) of ASD associated with DSM‐5 diagnostic criteria using a 4‐point scale. The following scores were computed: a total score summing all items, domain scores summing social communication and restricted, repetitive behavior items, and number of RF counting items with scores of 2 or 3 indicating clear symptom presence. The performance of the total, domain, and RF scores and individual items were examined. A composite score was formed with six items with the best psychometric performance: poor eye gaze directed to faces, limited showing and pointing, limited coordination of nonverbal communication, less interest in people than objects, repetitive use of objects, and excessive interest in particular objects, actions, or activities. The 6‐item composite provides a brief measure with optimal performance, while the RF may be instrumental for clinicians who are interested in characterizing the range of observed symptoms. The SORF shows promise as a practical alternative to currently available screening methods for implementation by nonexperts with the potential to increase feasibility and reduce common obstacles to access to care. Autism Res 2020, 13: 122–133. © The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Lay Summary: Research suggests that current autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening tools are not accurate enough to use in routine screening. The Systematic Observation of Red Flags was developed as a practical option for children at high risk for ASD. It can be used with video‐recorded samples of parent–child interactions in the home and by raters who are not experts in ASD. It shows promise in predicting ASD risk in toddlers to determine if a full diagnostic evaluation is necessary.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased use of telehealth approaches could reflect the movement toward recovery by enabling remote evaluation and identification of children with ASD.
“This could reflect increased use of telehealth approaches that enabled remote evaluation and identification of children with ASD (12–16).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Glascoe, F. P. (1996). Developmental screening In Wolraich M. (Ed.), Disorders of development and learning: A practical guide to assessment and management (pp. 89– 128). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
- Wetherby, A. M., & Prizant, B. M. (2002). Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile‐First (Normed ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
- Authors
- Dow, D., Day, T. N., Kutta, T. J., Nottke, C., & Wetherby, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dow, Deanna
- Venue
- Autism Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-133
- ISSN
- 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3806
- PMC
- PMC6972690
- OpenAlex
- W2981975436
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Autism Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD065272, R01HD078410)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, autism screening, toddlers, home observation, red flags, psychometric properties, developmental delay, parent-child interaction, gaze, pointing, restricted and repetitive behaviors, social communication
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Fixation, Ocular, House Calls, Humans, Infant, Male, Play and Playthings, Psychometrics, Social Behavior, Videotape Recording, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review