Cited by 17Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein purification and stabilityHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

A camelid nanobody against EGFR was easily obtained through refolding of inclusion body expressed in Escherichia coli

Xu, Li, Song, Xiaoyu, Jia, Lingyun·2017·Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry

Abstract

Using anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) nanobody is a good choice for diagnoses and therapeutics for high EGFR expression diseases. In the present study, the percentage composition of anti-EGFR nanobody attained 25% of the total cell protein expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). However, almost all nanobodies were expressed as inclusion bodies. To acquire active nanobodies, a series of dilution refolding procedures were optimized after inclusion bodies were dissolved into 6 M urea and purified with immobilized metal affinity chromatography. The results showed the refolding rate of the anti-EGFR nanobodies attained to 73%, and about 100 mg nanobodies were refolded from 1 L cells under the conditions that the initial nanobody concentration was 0.3 mg/mL, the dilution speed was 2.5 mL/Min, the dilution buffer was Tris-HCl at pH 8.0, the additives were 0.2 M Arg, 5 mM reduced glutathione (GSH), and 1 mM oxidized glutathione (GSSG). Then the activity of the refolded nanobodies was confirmed. The results showed that the refolded anti-EGFR nanobodies, in a dose-dependent manner, bounded to the tumor cell surface of A431 and MCF-7 and significantly inhibited the proliferation of A431 caused by the epidermal growth factor. Our study provides a facile method to rapidly, efficiently, and massively prepare anti-EGFR antibodies and promotes anti-EGFR-based recognition in cancer diagnoses and therapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bab.1544

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein recovery strategies from inclusion bodies via solubilization and refolding processes are laborious, time-consuming and expensive, although various refolding procedures have been developed for therapeutic proteins and applied for antibody fragments.

    “Protein recovery strategies from inclusion bodies via solubilization and refolding processes are laborious, time-consuming and expensive, although various refolding procedures have been developed for therapeutic proteins and applied for antibody fragments [78,79,80].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, L., Song, X., & Jia, L.
Affiliations
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Jia, Lingyun
Venue
Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
895-901
ISSN
  • 0885-4513 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8744
OpenAlex
W2556637466
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
epidermal growth factor receptor, camelid nanobodies, inclusion body refolding, recombinant expression in Escherichia coli, urea denaturation, A431 cells, MCF-7 cells, cancer diagnosis
MeSH terms
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Escherichia coli, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Protein Refolding, Single-Domain Antibodies, MCF-7 Cells, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review