The DOI matches its Crossref record.
All biomass is local: The cost, volume produced, and global warming impact of cellulosic biofuels depend strongly on logistics and local conditions
Abstract
Current models of cellulosic biofuel systems require that the delivered price of the cellulosic biomass feedstock be kept low. Thus the predicted biorefinery size is relatively small, limiting potential economies of scale. However, it is actually the ultimate selling price of the biofuel that largely determines market penetration. We relaxed the constraint of low delivered feedstock price and explored the resulting effects on biofuel price, biofuel volume produced, and global warming impact (GWI). Feedstock price greatly affects the feedstock supply chains that may develop. Increased feedstock price does not affect the final ethanol selling price very much, but higher feedstock prices greatly increase the amount of ethanol produced. Farmers will supply much more cellulosic biomass at higher feedstock prices, leading to shorter transportation distances with reduced transportation costs and enabling larger biorefineries with improved economies of scale, thereby reducing the ethanol selling price. The cellulosic feedstock supply chain systems were studied as a function of feedstock prices by determining potential feedstock supply clusters and the maximum capacity of cellulosic biorefineries across the United States. Supply clusters were determined by minimizing costs associated with ethanol production. The analysis is based on county‐level cellulosic feedstock production data projected in the US Billion‐Ton Update report. Each biomass supply cluster is unique in terms of local a…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most bioenergy modeling efforts are implicitly based on a static approach, which is based on average (or time-independent) values for foreground and background systems.
“Most bioenergy modeling efforts are implicitly based on a static approach, which is based on average (or time- independent) values for foreground and background systems (Adler et al.,2007; Dwivedi et al.,2015; Kim & Dale, 2015; Kim et al., 2019, 2020; Schmer et al., 2008, 2014; Tao, Tan, et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2012).”
From Global warming intensity of biofuel derived from switchgrass grown on marginal land in Michigan (2023) · cites this paper as Kim & Dale, 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- U.S. DOE, Integrated Biorefineries
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/bbb.25 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.055 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/bbb.1394 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.036 · DOI
- U.S. DOE, U.S. Billion‐Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry
- Argonne National Laboratory, Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) Computer Model
- 10.2172/1013269 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bbb.133 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.016 · DOI
- US DOE, 2013, Integrated Biorefineries: Biofuels, Biopower, and Bioproducts, 4
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Life Cycle Inventory Database
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, 996, 10.1017/CBO9780511546013 · DOI
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
- 10.1002/bbb.1391 · DOI
- Carolan JE, 2007, Technical and financial feasibility analysis of istributed bioprocessing using regional biomass pre‐processing centers, J Agric Food Ind Org, 5, 1
- 10.1002/bbb.318 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
Robertson, G. P., Hamilton, S. K., Barham, B. L., Dale, B. E., Izaurralde, R. C., Jackson, R. D., Landis, D. A., Swinton, S. M., Thelen, K. D., & Tiedje, J. M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal2324 · Cited by 440
Self-citationCarbon-Negative Biofuel Production
Kim, S., Zhang, X., Reddy, A. D., Dale, B. E., Thelen, K. D., Jones, C. D., Izaurralde, R. C., Runge, T., & Maravelias, C. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c01097 · Cited by 44
Self-citationBiomass Production a Stronger Driver of Cellulosic Ethanol Yield than Biomass Quality
Sanford, G. R., Oates, L. G., Roley, S. S., Duncan, D. S., Jackson, R. D., Robertson, G. P., & Thelen, K. D. (2017) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2016.08.0454 · Cited by 35
Global warming intensity of biofuel derived from switchgrass grown on marginal land in Michigan
Kim, S., Dale, B. E., Martinez‐Feria, R., Basso, B., Thelen, K., Maravelias, C. T., Landis, D., Lark, T. J., & Robertson, G. P. (2023) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.13024 · Cited by 21
“…efforts are implicitly based on a static approach, which is based on average (or time-independent) values for foreground and background systems (Adler et al., 2007; Dwivedi et al., 2015; Kim & Dale, 2015; Kim et al., 2019, 2020; Schmer et al., 2008, 2014; Tao, Tan, et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S., & Dale, B. E.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dale, Bruce E.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 422-434
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2024436126
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2015-11-18)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DE-FC02-07ER64494)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- cellulosic biofuels, cellulosic ethanol, feedstock prices, biomass supply chain, economies of scale, transportation costs, climate change impacts, biomass logistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review