Economic analysis of forest residues supply chain options to produce enhanced‐quality feedstocks
Abstract
Woody biomass feedstock that is both high quality and low cost has become increasingly important for the bioenergy and bioproducts industries. Logging generates forest residues – low‐quality feedstock – and additional operations that also incur additional costs, such as biomass sorting and treetops processing (BSTP), micro‐chipping, and screening, which are required to improve the feedstock's quality. Considering recent developments in technologies and BSTP to generate high‐quality feedstocks, economic models were developed in this study to estimate various forest‐residue logistics operational costs and to analyze the economics of delivering feedstocks to biomass conversion technology (BCT) sites near woods or power plants located far away in the form of chips, hog fuel, and bales. The results show that the cost of BSTP can vary between $30 and $82/ODMT (oven dry metric ton) based on the biomass sorting intensity. The most economical way to deliver forest residues was transporting processed stem‐wood from landings to near‐wood BCT sites and comminuting it into woodchips there (~$20/ODMT, assuming a one‐way (32 km) road distance and no cost of BSTP at landings). Grinding slash at the landing and transporting ground‐biomass (i.e., hog fuel) to a plant (< 22 km away) was more economical than transporting bales from landings and grinding at the plant. The economic feasibility of baling and BSTP requires a substantial productivity improvement or recognition and incorporation of be…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forest residues usually have low bulk and energy densities but high moisture content, which tends to generate high costs for feedstock transportation, handling, and drying.
“In addition, forest residues usually have both low bulk and energy densities but high moisture content, which tends to generate a high cost for feedstock transportation, handling, and drying [13,14].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Sahoo, K., Bilek, E., Bergman, R., Kizha, A. R., & Mani, S.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Forest Products Laboratory (US)
- University of Maine (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sahoo, Kamalakanta
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 514-534
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2905818277
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐EE0006297)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- forest residues, biomass supply chain, hog fuel, wood chips, biomass conversion technologies, bioenergy economics, forest health, wildfire risk reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review