Reflection on the research on and implementation of biorefinery systems – a systematic literature review with a focus on feedstock
Open accessAbstract
Te concept of sustainably processing biomass into a spectrum of products and bioenergy is thousands of years old. Large‐scale utilization of such processes existed in the 19th century and the term biorefinery first appeared in the late 20th century. This review addresses how different feedstock classes, products, and regions have been described in the scientific literature on the development of biorefineries (1999–2017). The results of a systematic literature review were compared with information included in two reports on the implementation of biorefineries to identify similarities and differences between theory (described in the literature) and practice (carried out in industry). The number of scientific articles per year on this topic has increased over the last decade, particularly in the fields of natural sciences and engineering. The first authors of these articles are primarily affiliated with North American and European institutions. References to lignocellulosic raw materials (especially residues, but also dedicated crops) in the feedstock are by far the most frequent and those to aquatic biomass have also increased over time. Most of the products mentioned are related to energy products (mainly fuels), and the heterogeneous class of chemicals was also strongly represented. We examined two reports on existing biorefineries in Europe and identified differences between the roles of food‐crop‐based biorefineries and lignocellulosic‐feedstock biorefineries in terms of research and practice. New studies on the practical implementation of biorefineries should be carried out, with particular attention to these discrepancies. © 2019 The Authors. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given the low-cost of most waste biomass, BAF developers have been rapidly considering these as feedstock.
“Given the low-cost of most waste biomass, BAF developers have been rapidly considering these as feedstock (Mawhood et al. 2016, Barbosa 2017, Wenger and Stern 2019).”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Wenger and Stern 2019
Cites
Holladay, J. E., White, J. F., Bozell, J. J., & Johnson, D. (2007) · doi:10.2172/921839 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Suganya, T., Varman, M., Masjuki, H. H., & Renganathan, S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems
Cherubini, F., Jungmeier, G., Wellisch, M., Willke, T., Skiadas, I., Van Ree, R., & de Jong, E. (2009) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.172 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“Given the low-cost of most waste biomass, BAF developers have been rapidly considering these as feedstock (Mawhood et al., 2016; Barbosa, 2017; Wenger and Stern, 2019).”
BackgroundExtraction of Cellulose from Sugarcane Bagasse Optimization and Characterization
Melesse, G. T., Hone, F. G., & Mekonnen, M. A. (2022) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/1712207 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wenger, J., & Stern, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Graz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Wenger, Julia
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1347-1364
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2945266589
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie
- Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
- Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Keywords
- biorefinery, biomass feedstock, lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural residues, aquatic biomass, biofuels, bioproducts, research-practice gap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review