The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries
Abstract
This paper explores the factors that influence the optimal size of biorefineries and the resulting unit cost of biofuels produced by them. Technologies examined include dry grind corn to ethanol, lignocellulosic ethanol via enzymatic hydrolysis, gasification and upgrading to hydrogen, methanol, and Fischer Tropsch liquids, gasification of lignocellulosic biomass to mixed alcohols, and fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to bio‐oil. On the basis of gallons of gasoline equivalent (gge) capacity, optimally sized gasification‐to‐biofuels plants were found to be 50–100% larger than biochemical cellulosic ethanol plants. Biorefineries converting lignocellulosic biomass into transportation fuels were found to be optimally sized in the range of 240–486 million gge per year compared to 79 million gge per year for a grain ethanol plant. Among the biofuel options, ethanol, whether produced biochemically or thermochemically, is the most expensive to produce. Lignocellulosic biorefineries will require 4.7–7.8 million tons of biomass annually compared to 1.2 million tons of corn grain for a grain ethanol plant. Factors that could reduce the optimal size of lignocellulosic biorefineries are discussed. © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass
Balan, V. (2014) · ISRN Biotechnology · doi:10.1155/2014/463074 · Cited by 551
Ionic liquid based pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced bioconversion
Usmani, Z., Sharma, M., Gupta, P., Karpichev, Y., Gathergood, N., Bhat, R., & Gupta, V. K. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123003 · Cited by 404
The integration of green chemistry into future biorefineries
H. Clark, J., E. I. Deswarte, F., & J. Farmer, T. (2009) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.119 · Cited by 241
A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways
Brown, T. R. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.053 · Cited by 164
Shahid, M. K., Batool, A., Kashif, A., Nawaz, M. H., Aslam, M., Iqbal, N., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113268 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, M., & Brown, R. C.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-200
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2059409892
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bbb.25
- The paper
- Wright, M., & Brown, R. C. (2007). Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.