Cited by 244Biofuel production and bioconversionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gases to bioethanol

Abubackar, Haris Nalakath, Veiga, María C., Kennes,, Christian·2011·Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining

Abstract

Abstract Bioconversion of syngas/waste gas components to produce ethanol appears to be a promising alternative compared to the existing chemical techniques. Recently, several laboratory‐scale studies have demonstrated the use of acetogens that have the ability to convert various syngas components (CO, CO 2 , and H 2 ) to multicarbon compounds, such as acetate, butyrate, butanol, lactate, and ethanol, in which ethanol is often produced as a minor end‐product. This bioconversion process has several advantages, such as its high specificity, the fact that it does not require a highly specific H 2 /CO ratio, and that biocatalysts are less susceptible to metal poisoning. Furthermore, this process occurs under mild temperature and pressure and does not require any costly pre‐treatment of the feed gas or costly metal catalysts, making the process superior over the conventional chemical catalytic conversion process. The main challenge faced for commercializing this technology is the poor aqueous solubility of the gaseous substrates (mainly CO and H 2 ). In this paper, a critical review of CO‐rich gas fermentation to produce ethanol has been analyzed systematically and published results have been compared. Special emphasis has been given to understand the microbial aspects of the conversion process, by highlighting the role of different micro‐organisms used, pathways, and parameters affecting the bioconversion. An analysis of the process fundamentals of various bioreactors used for the biological conversion of CO‐rich gases, mainly syngas to ethanol, has been made and reported in this paper. Various challenges faced by the syngas fermentation process for commercialization and future research requirements are also discussed. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bbb.256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 244

Authors
Abubackar, H. N., Veiga, M. C., & Kennes
Affiliations
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Corresponding author
Kennes,, Christian
Venue
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
93-114
ISSN
  • 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-104X
OpenAlex
W2071138071
Cited by
244
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • RUC (Universidade Da Coruña) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
syngas fermentation, bioethanol production, carbon monoxide, acetogenic bacteria, bioreactor design, commercialization challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review