The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supercritical water gasification
Abstract
This article reviews the work relating to the supercritical water gasifi cation of biomass with a focus on hydrogen production. The high hydrogen yield predicted by thermodynamic calculations and the special properties of near‐ and supercritical water support the biomass degradation; these were the main reasons why the process of = supercritical water gasifi cation was investigated. The main advantage is that biomass, with a natural water content of 80 wt.% or more, can be converted without drying before. The energy required for heating up the relatively high water amount can be recovered by a compact heat exchanger, which is very important for the overall energy balance. The chemistry of biomass degradation is rather complex: from experiments with model compounds, the main reaction pathways and their dependencies on reaction conditions are identifi ed. This knowledge was applied in studies of biomass conversion. Biomass may include proteins and salts, which have a signifi cant infl uence on the gasifi cation: salts increase and proteins decrease the gas yield at comparable reactions conditions. In addition, the heating‐up rate and the reactor type used infl uence the results. For the scale‐up in view of a technical application, a bench‐scale plant is necessary. This plant exists for some years and demonstrates the process feasibility also in the scale of 100 kg/h. Still challenges for a technical application, like corrosion and solid handling, exist. © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Corrosion in high-temperature and supercritical water and aqueous solutions: a review
Kritzer, P. (2004) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/s0896-8446(03)00031-7 · Cited by 660
Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water
Antal, M. J., Allen, S. G., Schulman, D., Xu, X., & Divilio, R. J. (2000) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0003436 · Cited by 610
Kabyemela, B. M., Adschiri, T., Malaluan, R. M., & Arai, K. (1999) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie9806390 · Cited by 592
Acid-Catalyzed Production of 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural from d-Fructose in Subcritical Water
Salak Asghari, F., & Yoshida, H. (2006) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie051088y · Cited by 500
Bühler, W., Dinjus, E., Ederer, H. J., Kruse, A., & Mas, C. (2002) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/s0896-8446(01)00105-x · Cited by 489
Self-citationCatalytic hydrothermal gasification of biomass
Elliott, D. C. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.74 · Cited by 384
Sınaǧ, A., Kruse, A., & Rathert, J. (2004) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie030475+ · Cited by 327
Self-citationChemical Reactions of C1 Compounds in Near-Critical and Supercritical Water
Watanabe, M., Sato, T., Inomata, H., Smith, R. L., Arai, K., Kruse, A., & Dinjus, E. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020415y · Cited by 282
Self-citationOkuda, K., Umetsu, M., Takami, S., & Adschiri, T. (2004) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.027 · Cited by 187
Aqueous catalyst systems for the water-gas shift reaction. 1. Comparative catalyst studies
Elliott, D. C., & Sealock, L. J. (1983) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development · doi:10.1021/i300011a008 · Cited by 91
Aqueous catalyst systems for the water-gas shift reaction. 2. Mechanism of basic catalysis
Elliott, D. C., Hallen, R. T., & Sealock, L. J. (1983) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development · doi:10.1021/i300011a009 · Cited by 82
Cited by
An overview of advances in biomass gasification
Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Clough, P., Yao, J., Zhong, X., Memon, M. Z., Shah, N., Anthony, E. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee00935b · Cited by 1,258
A review of hydrothermal biomass processing
Tekin, K., Karagöz, S., & Bektaş, S. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.216 · Cited by 730
Hydrothermal conversion of lignin: A review
Kang, S., Li, X., Fan, J., & Chang, J. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.013 · Cited by 552
A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock
Kumar, M., Olajire Oyedun, A., & Kumar, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270 · Cited by 534
Valorization of hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase: pathways towards commercial viability
Watson, J., Wang, T., Si, B., Chen, W.-T., Aierzhati, A., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2019.100819 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruse, A.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 415-437
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2129990921
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
