The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acyl glucuronides: the good, the bad and the ugly
Abstract
Acyl glucuronidation is the major metabolic conjugation reaction of most carboxylic acid drugs in mammals. The physiological consequences of this biotransformation have been investigated incompletely but include effects on drug metabolism, protein binding, distribution and clearance that impact upon pharmacological and toxicological outcomes. In marked contrast, the exceptional but widely disparate chemical reactivity of acyl glucuronides has attracted far greater attention. Specifically, the complex transacylation and glycation reactions with proteins have provoked much inconclusive debate over the safety of drugs metabolised to acyl glucuronides. It has been hypothesised that these covalent modifications could initiate idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions. However, despite a large body of in vitro data on the reactions of acyl glucuronides with protein, evidence for adduct formation from acyl glucuronides in vivo is limited and potentially ambiguous. The causal connection of protein adduction to adverse drug reactions remains uncertain. This review has assessed the intrinsic reactivity, metabolic stability and pharmacokinetic properties of acyl glucuronides in the context of physiological, pharmacological and toxicological perspectives. Although numerous experiments have characterised the reactions of acyl glucuronides with proteins, these might be attenuated substantially in vivo by rapid clearance of the conjugates. Consequently, to delineate a relationship between acyl glucuronide formation and toxicological phenomena, detailed pharmacokinetic analysis of systemic exposure to the acyl glucuronide should be undertaken adjacent to determining protein adduct concentrations in vivo. Further investigation is required to ascertain whether acyl glucuronide clearance is sufficient to prevent covalent modification of endogenous proteins and consequentially a potential immunological response. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diclofenac-induced liver injury: a paradigm of idiosyncratic drug toxicity
Boelsterli, U. (2003) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00368-5 · Cited by 403
Cited by
Stepan, A. F., Walker, D. P., Bauman, J., Price, D. A., Baillie, T. A., Kalgutkar, A. S., & Aleo, M. D. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200168d · Cited by 698
LoGuidice, A., Wallace, B. D., Bendel, L., Redinbo, M. R., & Boelsterli, U. A. (2012) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.111.191122 · Cited by 197
Mechanism of Idiosyncratic Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI): Unresolved Basic Issues
Teschke, R., & Uetrecht, J. (2021) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-2020-ubih-05 · Cited by 58
Gill, M. W., Murphy, B. J., Cheng, P. T. W., Sivaraman, L., Davis, M., & Lehman-McKeeman, L. (2022) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2022.115885 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Regan, S. L., Maggs, J. L., Hammond, T. G., Lambert, C., Williams, D. P., & Park, B. K.
- Venue
- Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 367-395
- ISSN
- 0142-2782 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-081X
- OpenAlex
- W2060869897
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.